A Methodology Framework for Analyzing Health Misinformation to Develop Inoculation Intervention Using Large Language Models: A case study on covid-19
Malek, S.; Griffin, C.; Fraleigh, R. D.; Lennon, R. P.; Monga, V.; Shen, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe rapid growth of social media as an information channel has enabled the swift spread of inaccurate or false health information, significantly impacting public health. This widespread dissemination of misinformation has caused confusion, eroded trust in health authorities, led to noncompliance with health guidelines, and encouraged risky health behaviors. Understanding the dynamics of misinformation on social media is essential for devising effective public health communication strategies. ObjectiveThis study aims to present a comprehensive and automated approach that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to detect misinformation on social media, uncover the underlying causes and themes, and generate refutation arguments, facilitating control of its spread and promoting public health outcomes by inoculating people against health misinformation. MethodsWe use two datasets to train three LLMs, namely BERT, T5, and GPT-2, to classify documents into two categories: misinformation and non-misinformation. Additionally, we employ a separate dataset to identify misinformation topics. To analyze these topics, we apply three topic modeling algorithms--Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), Top2Vec, and BERTopic--and selected the optimal model based on performance evaluated across three metrics. Using a prompting approach, we extract sentence-level representations for the topics to uncover their underlying themes. Finally, we design a prompt text capable of identifying misinformation themes effectively. ResultsThe trained BERT model demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving 98% accuracy in classifying misinformation and non-misinformation, with a 44% reduction in false positive rates for AI-generated misinformation. Among the three topic modeling approaches employed, BERTopic outperformed the others, achieving the highest metrics with a Coherence Value (CV) of 0.41, Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information (NPMI) of -0.086, and Inverted RBO (IRBO) of 0.99. To address the issue of unclassified documents, we developed an algorithm to assign each document to its closest topic. Additionally, we proposed a novel method using prompt engineering to generate sentence-level representations for each topic, achieving a 99.6% approval rate as "appropriate" or "somewhat appropriate" by three independent raters. We further designed a prompt text to identify themes of misinformation topics and developed another prompt capable of detecting misinformation themes with 80% accuracy. ConclusionsThis study presents a comprehensive and automated approach to addressing health misinformation on social media using advanced machine learning and natural language processing techniques. By leveraging large language models (LLMs) and prompt engineering, the system effectively detects misinformation, identifies underlying themes, and provides explanatory responses to combat its spread. (Journal of Medical Internet Research) doi:
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing an automatic system for classifying chatter about health services from Twitter: A case study for Medicaid 95%
- Users’ Reactions on Announced Vaccines against COVID-19 Before Marketing in France: Analysis of Twitter posts 94%
- Information retrieval in an infodemic: the case of COVID-19 publications 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long COVID symptoms from Reddit: Characterizing post-COVID syndrome from patient reports 95%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.