Cost Reduction and Care Quality in Resource-Limited Settings - A Protocol for An Umbrella Review of Sterile versus Examination Gloves for Wound Care
Dzah, C. E.; Bulley, J. G. L.; Dzah, V. K.
Show abstract
IntroductionSterile gloves are widely used in wound care due to their perceived protection against infection. However, the high cost of sterile gloves poses challenges in resource-limited settings. On the other hand, examination or clean gloves (non-sterile) are more affordable and easily accessible but are often perceived as less protective against infection. This umbrella review aims to compare the use of sterile versus examination gloves for wound care in terms of care quality (protection against infection) and cost, and explore the implications for healthcare delivery in low-resource environments. Methods and AnalysisThis study will be conducted as an overview of systematic reviews. A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL and MEDLINE will be undertaken to identify relevant systematic reviews with meta-analyses comparing sterile and examination gloves in wound care and or minor surgical procedures. Data will be extracted and synthesized narratively. The AMSTAR 2 tool will be used for quality appraisal of included systematic reviews. Ethics and DisseminationAs this study involves secondary data from published systematic reviews, ethical approval will not be required. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant global health and clinical care conferences. PROSPERO Registration NumberCRD420251051136 Strengths and Limitations of This StudyO_LIThis study will provide a high-level synthesis of existing systematic reviews on glove use in wound care and or minor surgical procedures. C_LIO_LIThe study will employ a narrative synthesis with subgroup analysis where applicable, to enable a better understanding of findings. C_LIO_LIThe study will use the AMSTAR 2 tool to assess the quality of included systematic reviews. C_LIO_LIResults may be limited by variability in outcome reporting and the number of high-quality systematic reviews available. C_LIO_LIThe overview will not include primary studies not covered in existing systematic reviews. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 96%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
- Wound Complications Following Surgery to the Lymph Nodes: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and effectiveness of hand hygiene-related practices used community settings for removal of organisms from hands: A systematic review 93%
- Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a scoping review 92%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 93%
- Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 89%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 91%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 90%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.