Efficacy and feasibility of synergy-based multichannel functional electrical stimulation for chronic stroke gait rehabilitation: a pilot study
Levine, J. T.; Yu, X. S.; Munoz, R.; Fiorenza, A.; Smith, T.; Djuraskovic, I.; Peiffer, J.; Ambrosini, E.; Ferrante, S.; Webster, R.; Sakai, J.; Robison, J.; Roth, E.; Laczko, J.; Cotton, R. J.; Pedrocchi, A.; Pons, J. L.
Show abstract
Chronic stroke gait disorders involve impaired motor coordination. While high-intensity gait training (HIGT) is supported by current clinical practice guidelines, and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) to tibialis anterior addresses foot drop, extending FES to multiple muscles may improve functional outcomes. Leveraging a fast-to-don FES sleeve, we tested feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a personalized multichannel FES (MFES) intervention based on the individuals motor coordination impairment paired with HIGT. Fourteen chronic stroke survivors were randomly assigned to either HIGT or MFES+HIGT for six weeks. Feasibility was evaluated by measuring setup time and collecting feedback from participants and four therapists. Gait speed, endurance, gait biomechanics, and muscle synergies were assessed at baseline, midpoint, post-training, and one-month follow-up. System setup time plateaued at 4.53 minutes by the ninth session. Both participants and therapists rated the intervention highly feasible, acceptable, and usable. Adherence was high, with no dropouts in the MFES+HIGT group. While most participants reached target heart rate zones, those with severe impairments (N=3, <0.4 m/s gait speed) struggled to maintain these levels. Despite the small sample, only the MFES+HIGT group demonstrated significant endurance gains from baseline to post-training and follow-up, while both groups improved walking speed, impaired limb step length, and muscle synergy similarity to normative data. When excluding household ambulators, only the MFES+HIGT group showed post-training and follow-up gains in endurance and self-selected walking speed. This study demonstrates that synergy-based MFES is feasible for integration into chronic stroke gait rehabilitation supports larger-scale trials to validate clinical efficacy and identify responders.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Is Modular Control Related To Functional Outcomes In Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis And Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? 97%
- Biomechanical effects of adding an articulating toe joint to a passive foot prosthesis for incline and decline walking 96%
- Mediolateral foot placement control can be trained: Older adults learn to walk more stable, when ankle moments are constrained 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of targeted assistance and perturbations on the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in people with chronic stroke 97%
- Gait adaptation to asymmetric hip stiffness applied by a robotic exoskeleton 95%
- Application of a novel force-field to manipulate the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in human walking 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- In vivo characterization of Achilles subtendon function and morphology within the tendon cross section and along the free tendon 95%
- Eccentric exercise is not equal to eccentric contraction 95%
- Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Soleus Redistributes Lower-Limb Joint Work Distally in Young and Older Adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 95%
- Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Muscle Synergies During Complex Locomotor Task in Individuals With and Without Cerebral Palsy: A TMS and EMG Study 95%
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.