Back

Unlocking uterine biology at home: a validated platform for transforming menstrual effluence into a window on reproductive health

Gire, S.; Li, X.; Toth, C.; Doshi, M.; Gupta, S. K.; Parker, S.; Boles, D.; Tariyal, R.

2025-05-25 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.05.21.25327630
Show abstract

IntroductionAccess to accurate, non-invasive diagnostics remains a critical unmet need in womens health. Menstrual effluence, containing endometrial tissue, immune cells, and microbial communities, represents a clinically relevant specimen for genomic and molecular pathology applications, yet has historically been underutilized due to concerns about sample integrity and variability. MethodsWe developed and validated a standardized, at-home tampon-based collection system designed to preserve nucleic acids at ambient temperature for clinical-grade analyses. 1,067 tampon samples from 328 participants underwent, RNA sequencing and metatranscriptomic profiling to assess specimen transcript integrity, diagnostic fidelity, and microbial composition over time. 12 patients were exome sequenced using matched menstrual effluence and whole blood to assess assay concordance between sample types. ResultsRNA extracted from menstrual effluence maintained stability for up to 14 days without refrigeration, achieving sufficient yield and quality for sequencing in >97% of samples. Variant detection via exome sequencing demonstrated 100% concordance among overlapping single nucleotide variants between menstrual fluid and matched venous blood, confirming clinical equivalency for genetic testing. Transcriptomic analyses revealed cycle-dependent variation in key reproductive and immune markers, while metatranscriptomic profiling identified shifts in microbial communities consistent with known reproductive tract dysbiosis. ConclusionsStandardized at-home collection of menstrual effluence provides a clinically actionable platform that supports remote specimen acquisition without compromising molecular assay fidelity, offering a scalable solution to improve access to carrier screening, reproductive health assessment, and infectious disease monitoring in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 38%
13.0%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 16%
10.2%
3
Human Reproduction
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 11%
7.6%
5
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
7.6%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 7%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 0.7%
4.5%
8
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
10
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
11
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
1.6%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 13%
1.6%
15
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
18
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
19
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
24
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.7%