Back

Storm in a bottle: An experimental investigation of how extreme precipitation impacts phytoplankton communities

Barth, A. J.; Pinckney, J.; Krask, J.; Smith, E.; Stone, J.

2025-05-25 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.20.655176 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractPhytoplankton community composition in estuaries is tightly linked to freshwater input. While regular freshwater input typically delivers nutrients, fueling phytoplankton growth, the impact of extreme events is less certain. Several observational studies have documented increases in phytoplankton biomass following large precipitation events but cannot to adequately identify the mechanism driving this increase. This paper advances two hypotheses about what drives phytoplankton biomass change following extreme precipitation events. First, the Resident Response Hypothesis (RRH), which suggests local estuarine phytoplankton grow in response to favorable conditions. Alternatively, the Production Introduction Hypothesis (PIH) indicates that large rainfall events introduce new phytoplankton taxa to estuaries during run-off events associated with large storms. These hypotheses were tested at North Inlet Estuary (South Carolina, USA) through a novel experimental design, which utilized multiple treatments to mimic the distinct impacts of large rainfall events on natural phytoplankton communities. Experimental samples were analyzed using photopigments and flow-through imaging microscopy. This allowed a wide assessment of phytoplankton community change both through measuring chlorophyll-a and biomass concentration. Ultimately, there was a strong increase in phytoplankton growth in the storm treatments, primarily identified by diatom pigment increases in response to run-off delivered nutrients, providing support for the RRH. However, biomass concentration analysis of select diatom taxa revealed the introduction of new diatom taxa in run-off water communities. This supports the PIH, suggesting that initial growth from nutrient additions may be due to small cell growth as well as introduction of new taxa.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.0%
2
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
7
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Freshwater Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
20
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Algal Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%