Back

Beyond episodic early warning systems: a continuous clinical alert system for early detection of in-hospital deterioration

Scheid, M. R.; Friedman, B.; Oppenheim, M.; Hirsch, J. S.; Zanos, T. P.

2025-05-21 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.05.20.25327940 medRxiv
Show abstract

Efficient patient monitoring on the medical-surgical wards is crucial to prevent significant in-hospital adverse events. Standard episodic inpatient assessment of vital signs can potentially miss changes in health status and delay recognition of elevated risk. To reduce the likelihood of this delayed recognition of risk, we developed a wearable-based deep learning model, using only 9 inputs, to identify the onset of deterioration earlier than traditional early warning systems. We showed this model could generalize to produce clinical alerts ahead of a broad class of significant adverse clinical outcomes, including rapid response team (RRT) interventions, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, intubations, cardiac arrests, and in-hospital deaths. Using data from 888 adult non-ICU inpatient visits in four hospitals in New York and employing two different clinical grade wearable biosensors (4-8% data missingness, excluding SpO2), as part of a quality initiative, we trained a recurrent neural network (RNN) to predict both MEWS alerts and adverse clinical outcomes. Using multiple stages of validation, we showed in our retrospective, time-sequence duration optimized, prospective validation the RNN model was able to predict both periods of elevated MEWS scores (ROC AUC 0.89 +/- 0.3, PR AUC 0.58 +/- 0.14) and adverse clinical outcomes (accuracy: 81.8% on 11 events) up to an average of 17 hours in advance. Our results show that our wearable based RNN alert system outperforms traditional episodic clinical support tools in detecting early onset of inpatient deterioration; enabling timely interventions that can improve outcomes and reduce hospital costs for patients in early stages of deterioration.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.1%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
6
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
8
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
19
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%