Back

Socio-economic inequalities and the COVID-19 epidemic in France: territorial analyses by epidemic wave and by metropolitan area

Canton, L.; Schalkwijk, P.; Landier, J.; Rebaudet, S.; Mosnier, E.; Handschumacher, P.; Nauleau, S.; Malfait, P.; Launay, L.; Delpierre, C.; Kelly-Irving, M.; Smaili, S.; Vandentorren, S.; Gaudart, J.

2025-05-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.05.20.25327911 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies highlighted the relationships between socioeconomic inequalities and the populations risk to become disease or die during COVID-19 epidemic. In France, socioeconomic inequalities vary across metropolitan areas, but little is known if that could explain the spatial disparities observed in terms of incidence and testing rates. We assessed the impact of socioeconomic inequalities on testing and incidence rates of COVID-19 for each metropolitan area and wave. MethodsFor each of the 22 metropolitan areas, we relied on socioeconomic variables from census data to define socioeconomic profiles using classification on the principal components. We analysed associations between socioeconomic profiles, testing and incidence rates by epidemic wave from July-2020 to March-2023, using spatialised generalised additive mixed models. We performed meta-regressions to study the distribution of testing and incidence rate ratios (socially deprived vs privileged) across metropolitan areas, according to vaccination rates. ResultsSocially deprived metropolitan areas had lower testing rates than privileged, but during wave 4 (July-October-2021, extended health pass), testing rates increased in more deprived areas. Incidence rates were higher in deprived areas (waves 2-4, July-2020 to October-2021) but reversed between waves 6 to 9 (March-2022 to March-2023). Meta-regression analysis indicated that high vaccination coverage narrowed testing and incidence gaps between deprived and privileged. ConclusionsThe impact of social inequalities on the populations testing and incidence COVID-19 epidemic was driven by socioeconomic inequalities across metropolitan areas and varied across epidemic waves. Vaccination rates and the presence of health measures (lockdowns, health pass) seem to help reduce these disparities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
5
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
14
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%