A Scoping Review of Studies on Secure Messaging through Patient Portals: Persistent Challenges and the Promise of Human-Centered AI
Guo, Y.; Hu, D.; Zhou, Y.; Reynolds, T. L.; Zheng, K.
Show abstract
Secure messaging (SM) has seen increasing adoption over the past decade, prompting growing interest in understanding its impact on healthcare delivery. This review examines key themes in the existing SM research, such as usage patterns, perceived benefits, and persistent challenges, to identify research gaps and inform opportunities for sociotechnical solutions in the artificial intelligence (AI) era that could enhance patient-provider communication effectiveness. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Following the PRISMA guideline, we identified 366 relevant peer-reviewed studies published from January 2009 to September 2025. Existing research has primarily investigated (1) the effect of SM use on clinical outcomes, (2) adoption patterns, and (3) user experiences. The literature shows that SM promotes patient engagement, care coordination, and patient-provider communication. However, significant challenges persist, including privacy concerns, limited access for vulnerable populations, patient misuse, and increased clinician burden. Educational initiatives and patient-centered design are essential for promoting appropriate and accessible use of SM. Emerging AI solutions also show promise in enhancing SM use, particularly for message triaging and drafting replies. The integration of such AI solutions must be guided by robust governance frameworks to ensure transparency, maintain trust, and align with evolving clinical, billing, and regulatory environments. Future research should include more diverse care settings and populations, prioritizing the development of equitable sociotechnical tools and interventions that can be seamlessly integrated into clinical workflows.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 97%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 94%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 94%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Demonstrating the Consequences of Learning Missingness Patterns in Early Warning Systems for Preventative Health Care: A Novel Simulation and Solution 91%
- EHR-QC: A streamlined pipeline for automated electronic health records standardisation and preprocessing to predict clinical outcomes 91%
- A Deep Learning Approach for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patient Identification in Electronic Health Records 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.