Back

Nocturnal Glycemic Stability Index

Oliveira Andrade, L. J. d.; Matos de Oliveira, G. C.; Vinhaes Bittencourt, A. M.; Andrade, J. C. N. C.; de Oliveira, L. M.

2025-05-19 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.05.18.25327867 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe Nocturnal Glycemic Stability Index (NGSI) is a novel quantitative metric designed to comprehensively assess overnight glucose stability by integrating amplitude, frequency, and temporal patterns of glycemic fluctuations. NGSI addresses this gap by providing a multidimensional, sensitive measure tailored to the nocturnal period, enhancing risk stratification and therapeutic optimization in diabetes management. ObjectiveTo develop and validate the NGSI, a novel metric designed to comprehensively quantify overnight glucose stability. MethodThis multi-cohort study analyzed CGM data from individuals with T1DM and T2DM using FDA-approved devices over at least two weeks. The NGSI, integrating amplitude, frequency, and temporal stability of nocturnal glucose fluctuations, was developed and optimized via machine learning. Validation included cross-cohort ROC analyses, descriptive statistics, and group comparisons using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). ResultsA retrospective analysis of CGM data from three studies validated the NGSI for detecting nocturnal glycemic instability. Study 1 (n=23, T1DM) yielded an AUC-ROC of 0.80, study 1 (n=33,685, T1DM/T2DM) 0.85, and study 3 (n=31,034, T1DM/T2DM) 0.87. Descriptive statistics showed NGSI scores of 0.74 {+/-} 0.09 (study 1), 0.71 {+/-} 0.12 (study2), and 0.72 {+/-} 0.11 (study 3). ANOVA revealed no significant differences (F=1.996, p=0.138), confirmed by Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests. Final Index Range: NGSI [isin], where 1 denotes perfect stability. Interpretation: NGSI > 0.8: Optimal nocturnal glycemic stability. 0.5 [&le;]NGSI [&le;] 0.8: Moderate instability requiring monitoring. NGSI < 0.5: High instability necessitating therapeutic intervention. ConclusionNGSI offers a multidimensional, machine learning-optimized assessment of nocturnal glycemic stability, outperforming traditional metrics, but requires high-quality CGM data and further validation across diverse populations for clinical adoption.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.