Nocturnal Glycemic Stability Index
Oliveira Andrade, L. J. d.; Matos de Oliveira, G. C.; Vinhaes Bittencourt, A. M.; Andrade, J. C. N. C.; de Oliveira, L. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Nocturnal Glycemic Stability Index (NGSI) is a novel quantitative metric designed to comprehensively assess overnight glucose stability by integrating amplitude, frequency, and temporal patterns of glycemic fluctuations. NGSI addresses this gap by providing a multidimensional, sensitive measure tailored to the nocturnal period, enhancing risk stratification and therapeutic optimization in diabetes management. ObjectiveTo develop and validate the NGSI, a novel metric designed to comprehensively quantify overnight glucose stability. MethodThis multi-cohort study analyzed CGM data from individuals with T1DM and T2DM using FDA-approved devices over at least two weeks. The NGSI, integrating amplitude, frequency, and temporal stability of nocturnal glucose fluctuations, was developed and optimized via machine learning. Validation included cross-cohort ROC analyses, descriptive statistics, and group comparisons using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). ResultsA retrospective analysis of CGM data from three studies validated the NGSI for detecting nocturnal glycemic instability. Study 1 (n=23, T1DM) yielded an AUC-ROC of 0.80, study 1 (n=33,685, T1DM/T2DM) 0.85, and study 3 (n=31,034, T1DM/T2DM) 0.87. Descriptive statistics showed NGSI scores of 0.74 {+/-} 0.09 (study 1), 0.71 {+/-} 0.12 (study2), and 0.72 {+/-} 0.11 (study 3). ANOVA revealed no significant differences (F=1.996, p=0.138), confirmed by Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests. Final Index Range: NGSI [isin], where 1 denotes perfect stability. Interpretation: NGSI > 0.8: Optimal nocturnal glycemic stability. 0.5 [≤]NGSI [≤] 0.8: Moderate instability requiring monitoring. NGSI < 0.5: High instability necessitating therapeutic intervention. ConclusionNGSI offers a multidimensional, machine learning-optimized assessment of nocturnal glycemic stability, outperforming traditional metrics, but requires high-quality CGM data and further validation across diverse populations for clinical adoption.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating Heritability of Glycaemic Response to Metformin using Nationwide Electronic Health Records and Population-Sized Pedigree 90%
- Systematic review of precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes 90%
- Prospective validation of smartphone-based heart rate and respiratory rate measurement algorithms 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Observational assessments of the relationship of dietary and pharmacological treatment on continuous measures of dysglycemia over 24 hours in women with gestational diabetes 92%
- Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training to Improve Cardiometabolic Health in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for the Diabetes Inspiratory Training (DIT) Clinical Trial 90%
- Association Between Life’s Essential 8 and Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Adults: Insights from NHANES 2007-2018 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical interpretation of machine learning models for prediction of diabetic complications using electronic health records 93%
- Evaluation of a Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Wearable Data for Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers 91%
- Illustrating Potential Effects of Alternate Control Populations on Real-World Evidence-based Statistical Analyses 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Microbiome-targeting Fiber-enriched Nutritional Formula is Well Tolerated and Improves Quality of Life and Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial 92%
- Covid-19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score at hospital admission 90%
- Metabolomic Risk Predictors of Diabetic Foot Complications: a longitudinal observational study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.