Back

High-severity fires undermine resilience of black spruce-dominated boreal forests in eastern North America

Fortin, S.; Boucher, Y.; Bergeron, Y.; Simard, M.; Arseneault, D.; Asselin, H.; Barette, M.; Danneyrolles, V.; Gauthier, S.; Girard, F.; Girardin, M.; Parisien, M.-A.; Thiffault, N.; Valeria, O.

2025-05-23 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.17.654490 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate-induced fire regime shifts may reduce post-fire resilience of black spruce-dominated (BS; Picea mariana) North American boreal forests. While post-fire vulnerability of immature BS stands has been extensively studied, no study has evaluated simultaneous effects of fire severity and seasonality on the post-fire regeneration of mature (> 60-year-old) BS stands. This study aims to quantify post-fire regeneration levels of BS and co-occurring tree species to assess ecosystem recovery and possible loss of resilience due to regeneration failure. We analyzed effects of seed bank conditions, fire regime characteristics (fire severity and seasonality), and seedbed conditions on BS post-fire regeneration in mature forests in Quebec, Canada. Post-fire regeneration density was extensively surveyed across [~]50 400 km2 through a network of 536 plots that were distributed in 21 fires, which burned between 1995 and 2016. One-third of plots failed to regenerate (< 1750 conifer seedlings/ha) at levels adequate to produce closed-crown forest, whereas one-fifth experienced compositional changes, mainly towards jack pine (JP; Pinus banksiana) dominance. Pre-fire basal area of BS and living Sphagnum ground cover increased BS post-fire regeneration, whereas high-severity crown fires and spring fires reduced it. These findings suggest that mature BS-dominated forests may lose resilience in response to high-severity and spring fires. Given the projected increase in fire severity, and the extension towards an early-fire season in response to climate change, our study suggests that post-fire regeneration failure may become more frequent over the coming decades, with potential negative consequences on ecosystem services that are provided by BS-dominated boreal forests.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
6
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
7
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
11
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
12
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
18
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
21
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
22
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%