Back

Change point based dynamic functional connectivity estimation outperforms sliding window and static estimation for classification of early mild cognitive impairment in resting-state fMRI

Ondrus, M.; Cribben, I.

2025-05-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.16.654552 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The most widely used inputs in classification models of brain disorders such as early mild cognitive impairment (eMCI) or Alzheimers disease are estimates of static-based functional connectivity (SFC) and sliding window dynamic functional connectivity (swDFC). Although these methods are convenient for estimation and computational purposes, as it keeps the estimation tractable, they present a simplified version of a highly integrated and dynamic phenomenon. Change point dynamic functional connectivity (cpDFC) methods, which are far less commonly used, offer an alternative to swDFC approaches. In this study, we consider a classification task between controls and patients with eMCI using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) studies, ADNI2 and ADNIGO. Our results indicate that the DFC methods are generally superior to the SFC methods when used as inputs into the classification model. Most importantly, we find that the cpDFC methods are generally superior to the widely used swDFC methods. We discuss how cpDFC methods offer many distinct advantages over swDFC methods, namely, the parsimony of network features and ease of interpretability. We validate the robustness and consistency of our results by testing the methods on an additional resting-state fMRI dataset of mild cognitive impairment patients. These findings call into question the validity of numerous fMRI studies that have utilized inferior approaches, such as SFC and swDFC, as inputs to classification models to predict various brain disorders. Finally, we present an ensemble model of the best models, which achieves an accuracy of 91.17% from leave-one-out cross-validation of subjects with eMCI. Our results suggest that the underlying functional networks are dynamic, multiscale, and that different FC methods capture distinct information for classification efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.7%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.3%
3
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
5
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
6
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
11
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
19
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%