Back

From Movement to METs: A Validation of ActTrust(R) for Energy Expenditure Estimation and Physical Activity Classification in Young Adults

dos Santos Batista, E.; Basilio Gomes, S. R.; Bruno de Morais Ferreira, A.; Franca, L. G. S.; Fontenele Araujo, J.; Mortatti, A. L.; Leocadio-Miguel, M. A.

2025-05-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.16.654458 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Physical activity (PA) is recognised for providing several health benefits in humans, mainly preventing and controlling chronic non-communicable diseases. However estimating PA is a challenging and expensive task. An alternative would be to devise a model to estimate PA using actigraphy devices calibrated from an initially validated model. This has been previously done to a number of devices, including ActiGraph(R) GT3X+. In this study we aimed at validating ActTrust(R) against the widely used GT3X+ and comparing activity counts to metabolic equivalents (METs) derived from indirect calorimetry during treadmill walking and running. Fifty-six young adults (34 men, 22 women) participated in controlled effort exercises including light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous activity intensities. We developed a general linear model to estimate energy expenditure (EE) from movement count of combinations of GT3X+ and ActTrust devices placed at hip or wrist. We then estimated cut-off points for each intensity range. Our results showed correlations between treadmill speed, METs, and movement counts across all devices and placements combinations. Our proposed model performed well with balanced accuracies above 0.77 for all intensity ranges and over 0.9 for light and moderate activity. This is the first study to model estimate and validate PA intensity thresholds on ActTrust(R) devices. Our findings support the use of ActTrust(R) devices in PA estimation as a low complexity and cost approach to allow 24-hour assessments of EE.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.0%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
12
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%