Back

Classification of Urticaceae based on morphology and phylogenetic inference

Monro, A. K.; Maurin, O.; Fu, L.-F.; Wells, T.; Wilmot-Dear, M.; Beentje, J.; Hind, N.; Friis, I.; Brewer, G.; Cowan, R.; Dodsworth, S.; Dong, J.; Epitawalage, N.; Sabino Kikuchi, I.; Larridon, I.; Moore, A.; Sauquet, H.; Ujetz, J.; Wei, Y.-G.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Forest, F.; Baker, W. J.; Gardner, E. M.

2025-05-19 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.05.16.651835 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Urticaceae (ca. 2600 species) were first formally recognized by Jussieu in the 18th century and last comprehensively monographed by Weddell in the 19th century. Since Weddells work, family delimitation has been modified and many genera described in a fragmented manner. Over the past two decades, numerous molecular studies have supported the inclusion of Cecropiaceae within Urticaceae and identified paraphyly in several genera, notably Laportea, Urera, Boehmeria, Parietaria, Pellionia, and Pouzolzia. However, few studies have translated these molecular insights into a revised taxonomy. This study aimed to provide a robust, updated classification for Urticaceae by: a) increasing taxon and genomic locus sampling through the integration of newly generated sequence data with previously published datasets; and b) incorporating morphological data to support a revised delimitation of tribes and genera, and to establish a new linear sequence for the family. We also sought to identify remaining taxonomic challenges. Using Sanger and Angiosperms353 sequence data, we constructed a phylogenetic framework for 57 out of 59 currently accepted genera. We also assessed the phylogenetic informativeness of 57 morphological characters by mapping them onto the phylogeny. Our analyses support the delimitation of 61 monophyletic genera and an infrafamilial classification comprising seven tribes, two of which we describe as new: Myriocarpeae and Leukosykeae. We provide a revised linear sequence for the family. Our classification reinstates several names previously treated as synonyms (Fleurya, Leptocnide, Margarocarpus, Polychroa, Scepocarpus, Sceptrocnide), places several genera in synonymy (Hemistylus and Rousselia under Pouzolzia; Hesperocnide under Urtica; Gesnouinia and Soleirolia under Parietaria), and proposes the recognition of two new genera, Muimar gen. nov. and Pouzolziella gen. nov., to accommodate Boehmeria nivea and Pouzolzia australis, respectively. Mapping morphological characters onto the phylogeny indicates that while most states are homoplastic at the family level, their combination is valuable for recognizing genera. Geographic character mapping suggests a high degree of spatial conservatism at the genus rank. Our dated ultrametric tree suggests an origin for Urticaceae in Indomalaya during the mid-Cretaceous, followed by establishment in the Laurasian boreotropical flora and subsequent dispersal to the neotropics and Africa. Once classified within an evolutionary framework we believe that the Urticaceae represent a valuable study system in evolutionary biology for investigating transitions across biomes, the drivers of floral trait evolution, and intrinsic speciation mechanisms. New tribes: --Leukosykeae, Myriocarpeae New genera: --Muimar, Pouzolziella

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
3
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
5
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
8
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%