Back

A rapid systematic scoping review of the levels of bacterial antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use amongst people in contact with the criminal justice system

Oliver-Williams, C.; Nasim, M.; Cook, M.; Edge, C.; Ashiru-Oredope, D.

2025-05-15 public and global health
10.1101/2025.05.15.25327687 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant public health threat. Individuals in contact with the criminal justice system may be particularly vulnerable due to living conditions, behaviours, and pre-existing health issues. This review assesses bacterial AMR and antibiotic use in this population. MethodsA rapid systematic scoping review was conducted (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XHCFJ). Embase, Medline, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 1 January 2010 and 28 September 2023. One author screened all records, with 10% dual-screened. Included studies examined AMR bacteria or antibiotic use among people in contact with the criminal justice system. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and STROBE AMS checklist. Findings were synthesized narratively. ResultsSixteen papers met inclusion criteria; eight were at lower risk of bias. Three studies examined antibiotic use, reporting common inappropriate prescribing (n=1) and associations between recent antibiotic use and resistant infections (n=2). Fourteen papers reported AMR findings, most with a focus on Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus. Drug-resistant TB prevalence in prison populations ranged from 5.2% to 37% (n=4). MRSA colonization ranged from 8.1% to 8.8% (n=4). Other bacteria examined included Salmonella spp., Acinetobacter spp., Group A Streptococcus, and Mycoplasma genitalium. ConclusionsPeople in contact with the criminal justice system face heightened risks of resistant bacterial infections. However, with only three studies addressing antibiotic use, evidence is limited. Addressing AMR in this group requires collaborative and targeted public health interventions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.