Back

Antibiotic Resistance Trends Among Outpatients With Urinary Tract Infections In North Western Tanzania

Magembe, E.; Mapunjo, S.; Mayenga, E.; Shao, J.; Lubega, C.; Makhaola, K.; Lumu, I.; Tanzania Fleming Fund Fellowship consortium,

2025-05-16 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.05.14.25327543
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections in the community and hospital settings and Enterobacteriaceae, are responsible for most infections. This study determined the prevalence and resistance trends of E. coli and K. pneumoniae to fluroquinolones and cephalosporins among out-patients diagnosed with urinary infections at a Zonal tertiary hospital in Tanzania METHODSThis was a prospective cross sectional time series conducted in northern Tanzania and enrolled all out patients presenting with UTI symptoms. The study conducted for a period of six months between march 2021 to September 2021. RESULTSDuring the study period1582 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 20.2(SD 22.2) years and 883(55.8%) were female. The prevalence of E. coli was higher in female patients at 12.0% compared 6.7% in male. Both E. coli and K. pneumoniae were most prevalent in patients over >45 years at 13.3% and 3.2% respectively. E.coli resistance to Ceftriaxone, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin was 41.0%, 36.8% and 51.0% respectively. Resistance K. pneumoniae to ceftriaxone, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin was shown to be 52.8%, 47.4% and 28.2% respectively. Meanwhile, 76/192(39.6%) isolates were identified as ESBL. CONCLUSIONSIn this setting empirical treatment of urinary tract infections with ciprofloxacin a commonly prescribed antibiotics for this diagnosis may not work in over half of patients when E,coli is the causative pathogen. Moreover, E. coli, resistance of 43% to ceftriaxone implies that patients who do not respond to initial therapy with ciprofloxacin, are at a risk of not responding to subsequent therapy necessitating the use of reserve antibiotics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 23%
18.0%
2
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 8%
5.6%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
4.8%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 4%
4.8%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 8%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 59%
2.6%
8
Tropical Medicine & International Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Health Science Reports
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
based on 19 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 11%
1.4%
14
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 12%
1.4%
15
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
19
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
20
Journal of Global Health
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 15%
1.3%
22
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 46%
1.3%
23
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
25
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 23%
0.7%
26
mSystems
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 9%
0.7%