Back

Drug Abuse In Nigeria; The Public Health Impact Of Collective Actions And Inactions: A Systematic Review

Oweibia, M.; Egberipou, T.; Timighe, G.; Ogbe, P. D.; Elemuwa, U. G.; Wilson, T. R.

2025-05-14 addiction medicine
10.1101/2025.05.13.25327537 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDrug abuse has reached alarming levels in Nigeria, with systemic vulnerabilities exacerbating the crisis. This systematic review evaluates the prevalence and patterns of drug abuse, examines the impact of collective actions and inactions, and identifies socio-economic and gender-specific barriers to treatment. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we synthesized data from 32 studies published between 2014 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on drug abuse in Nigeria, comprising observational, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Data extraction encompassed study details, methodologies, key findings, and quality assessments via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). ResultsThe pooled prevalence of drug abuse stands at 14.4% among individuals aged 15-64, with significant regional disparities. Urban areas, particularly among youth, exhibited higher rates of opioid misuse, driven by poverty and accessibility. Policy inaction, exemplified by underfunded rehabilitation services, and stigma further compound the issue. Gender-specific barriers, particularly for women, are marked by stigma, lack of childcare support, and socio- economic vulnerabilities. Collective actions have shown some success, yet limited implementation undermines overall impact. ConclusionThe review highlights a pressing need for coordinated efforts across sectors to combat drug abuse effectively. Addressing systemic issues such as poverty, stigma, and inadequate healthcare access is crucial. Implementing the National Drug Control Master Plan and prioritizing gender-sensitive policies will enhance treatment accessibility. Collaborative initiatives must focus on education, stigma reduction, and integrated healthcare to reverse the devastating trends of drug abuse in Nigeria.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.