The Wearipedia Project: a free and open-source resource for understanding and using wearables in decentralized clinical trials
Johansen, A.; Hur, K.; Hung, J.; Castellon, R.; Peng, T.; Ren, S.; White, R.; Park, C.; Lau, A.; Shah, S.; Choi, H. J.; Wang, W.; Sripitak, P.; Elhusinni, M.; Snyder, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundFinding the optimal wearable biomedical sensor (ref. wearable) for a clinical research study can be challenging. Many wearables are consumer electronics and are not designed for clinical research and their clinical variables vary widely. We aimed to build a resource for clinical researchers to select the best device for their research study, and programming tools to facilitate wearable research. MethodsFor each wearable entry, we document the following-- Open-source coding tools: we built data extraction, simulation, statistical testing, and educational materials; Clinical trial usage: trials using the device including ChatGPT-generated summaries; Privacy evaluation: low data risk, HIPAA compliance, de-identification, third-party data sharing, and third-party data sharing transparency; Security evaluation: wearable connectivity and API access protocols. FindingsThe Wearipedia database consists of 19 wearables + 5 Apps; 7 smart watches, 4 fitness trackers, 2 chest straps, 2 CGM devices, 1 smart ring, 1 arm strap, 1 under the bed sleep tracker, 1 smart scale, 2 apps for diet tracking, 1 app for questionnaires, and 2 apps for data storage. For public coding tools, there where 891 pages of educational material across 22 wearables and apps. We support data extraction from 13 official APIs and 3 unofficial APIs under the Wearipedia pypi package. For clinical usage, there where 63 ({+/-} 99) clinical trials per device. For security and privacy, a total of 87 citations and an average of 3.48 citations are referenced, mostly consisting of privacy policies, terms-of-service agreements, and wearable manuals. The Wearipedia database is conveniently accessible through a website at https://wearipedia.com. InterpretationsWearables can accurately predict important physiological parameters, glucose, and sleep. However, access to high resolution data can be restrictive, characterizing data accuracy is difficult, and wearable data is often not protected from third party reselling, including government requests. FundingThis work was made possible by the support of the BV and Anu Jagadeesh Family Foundation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 95%
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 92%
- Longitudinally Tracking Personal Physiomes for Precision Management of Childhood Epilepsy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 93%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 91%
- VisualR: a novel and scalable solution for assessing visual function using virtual reality 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Heart disease risk through quality-focused diet logging: pre-post study of a diet quality tracking app 92%
- The Mezurio smartphone application: Evaluating the feasibility of frequent digital cognitive assessment in the PREVENT dementia study 91%
- Reliable Contactless Monitoring of Heart Rate, Breathing Rate and Breathing Disturbance During Sleep in Aging: A Digital Health Technology Evaluation Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.