Back

Sensitivity, throughput, and cost analysis of concentration methods for multi-target pathogen wastewater monitoring

Wu, J.; Wang, M. x.; Treangen, T. J.; Ensor, K. B.; Hopkins, L.; Stadler, L.

2025-05-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.05.12.25327458 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wastewater-based epidemiology is an efficient method for monitoring the transmission of diverse pathogens in communities. Standard wastewater surveillance workflows typically involve wastewater concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and pathogen quantification. While various concentration methods are used, most comparisons of concentration methods have focused primarily on SARS-CoV-2, highlighting the need for further research to guide method selection for monitoring a suite of diverse pathogens. In this study, a head-to-head comparison of six different concentration methods was performed, including direct extraction (with and without bead beating), electronegative (HA) filtration, solids concentration, and magnetic bead-based concentration (using Nanotrap(R) particles; with and without bead beating). Methods were assessed for sensitivity, inhibitor removal, and recovery rates of fourteen microorganisms, including viruses, bacteria, and fungal pathogens. The cost of each method was also estimated. Results showed that the concentration method selection significantly impacts the sensitivity and economic costs of the wastewater monitoring workflow. Based on the results, a concentration approach that combines HA filtration and solids concentration is recommended to optimize detection across various pathogens. This study provides data-driven insights to enhance the reliability and cost-effectiveness of wastewater surveillance systems that can support public health responses for a broad range of diseases. SynopsisSix concentration methods were compared in terms of sensitivity and cost for the detection of 14 diverse pathogens in wastewater.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.3%
2
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
3
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
5
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
6
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
7
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
10
PLOS Water
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Chemical Engineering Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
15
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
16
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%