Development of the TBQ+D: A Novel Patient-Reported Measure of The Burden of Digital Care
Al Zahidy, M.; Guevara, K.; Simha, S.; Borras-Osorio, M.; Branda, M.; Tran, V.-T.; Ridgeway, J.; Montori, V. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatients with diabetes often manage complex treatment regimens that increasingly include the use of digital medicine tools. While several instruments measure treatment burden, none capture the specific burden introduced by digital medicine tools used in self-care. Development of patient reported measures to capture digital treatment burden are needed to assess the lived experiences and challenges patients face when using digital medicine tools. ObjectiveTo engage patients and clinical experts in adapting an existing measure of treatment burden--the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ). The adapted instrument underwent cognitive testing and refinements to ensure it could capture the burden of using digital medicine tools in the self-management and care of diabetes. MethodsThis two-phase study was conducted with adults with diabetes and other chronic conditions at the Division of Endocrinology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. First, we mapped themes from prior concept elicitation interviews to existing TBQ items to identify content gaps related to digital burden. Based on these gaps, the study team and expert panel followed an item development guide to generate new items and adapt existing ones to better reflect the workload and burdens imposed by digital medicine tools. The resulting adapted instrument underwent three rounds of cognitive testing with adult patients living with diabetes, using a think-aloud protocol to assess clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness. Results of cognitive testing informed iterative refinements across three rounds of interviews, leading to improved clarity, reduced redundancy, and improved relevance of items. ResultsThe final TBQ+D retained the structure of the original 15-item TBQ and included 8 new items and modified 8 extant ones to capture burden of digital care (e.g., syncing issues, discomfort from sensors, and device malfunctions). Cognitive testing demonstrated strong content relevance and patient comprehension. ConclusionThe TBQ+D appears able to measure digital treatment burden in patients with diabetes. Planned next steps include field testing the instrument to test validity hypotheses, and if successful, extending this evaluation to diverse populations and clinical and research settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial 93%
- Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model 92%
- Digital Health Tools for the Passive Monitoring of Depression: A Systematic Review of Methods 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 92%
- An mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study 91%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 93%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the impact on clinical task efficiency of a natural language processing algorithm for searching medical documents: Prospective crossover study 92%
- Assessment of Accuracy and Safety of LabTest Checker (LTC-AI) 91%
- Is the quality of hospital EHR data sufficient to evidence its ICHOM outcomes performance in heart failure? A pilot evaluation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.