Prevalence and patterns of different types of non-cigarette tobacco use in England: a population study
Jackson, S. E.; Taylor, E.; Tattan-Birch, H.; East, K.; Shahab, L.; Cox, S.; Mishu, M.; Hammond, D.; Brown, J.
Show abstract
IntroductionNon-cigarette tobacco smoking increased in England between 2013 and 2023, but little is known about the prevalence of use of specific types of non-cigarette tobacco, including smokeless products, or whether the increasing trend has continued. This study examined recent trends in exclusive non-cigarette tobacco smoking and estimated the prevalence of different smoked and smokeless product use by sociodemographic characteristics, vaping and cigarette smoking status. MethodsData came from the Smoking Toolkit Study, a nationally representative monthly cross-sectional survey of adults ([≥]18y) in England (n=94,918; April-2020 to February-2025). We used logistic regression to estimate trends in exclusive non-cigarette tobacco smoking. We further examined the prevalence and correlates of (non-exclusive) use of eight specific smoked and smokeless non-cigarette tobacco products among 8,129 participants surveyed October-2024 to February-2025. ResultsThe prevalence of exclusive non-cigarette tobacco smoking increased from 1.3% [1.1-1.6%] in April-2020 to 2.0% [1.8-2.1%] in August-2022, before declining to 1.2% [1.1-1.5%] by February-2025. Between October-2024 and February-2025, 3.7% [3.2-4.1%] of adults reported any non-cigarette tobacco use ([~]1.7 million people). Cigars (1.2%) and waterpipes (0.9%) were the most used products. Use patterns varied: cigars, cigarillos, and pipes were more common among men and those who smoked cigarettes, while waterpipes were more common among younger adults, minority ethnic groups, and people who vaped. Smokeless tobacco use was more common among those who smoked (any form of) tobacco. ConclusionsIn England, exclusive non-cigarette tobacco smoking has fluctuated in recent years. Patterns of smoked and smokeless tobacco use vary across products and sociodemographic groups.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in daily cigarette consumption among smokers: a population study in England, 2008-2023 98%
- Perceptions of children and young people in England on the smokefree generation policy: a focus group study 95%
- What is the relationship between raising the minimum legal sales age of tobacco above 20 and cigarette smoking? A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in vaping trends since the announcement of an impending ban on disposable vapes: a population study in Great Britain 97%
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 96%
- Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking, and quitting behaviour associated with the first Covid-19 lockdown in England 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 96%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 96%
- Impact of a regional educational advertising campaign on harm perceptions of e-cigarettes, prevalence of e-cigarette use, and quit attempts among smokers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Smoking in social housing among adults in England, 2015-2020: a nationally representative survey 94%
- Changes in Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Lung Function, and Other Clinical Health Outcomes When People Who Smoke Use E-cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking: An Exploratory Analysis from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.