How are social and economic needs assessed and addressed in mental health services? A service evaluation of the largest mental health trust in the UK
Greenburgh, A.; Baldwin, H.; Weir, H.; Asif, Z.; Laporte, D.; Bertram, M.; Crawford, A.; Duberry, G.; Lauter, S.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Lovelock, C.; Das-Munshi, J.; Morgan, C.
Show abstract
There is an urgent need for services to address the social and economic adversities which contribute to the aetiology and outcomes of mental health problems. However, the implementation of interventions to do so is inconsistent, and entrenched cycles of poor mental health and social exclusion persist. We conducted a service evaluation survey of 28 staff working across community and inpatient teams, enhanced by a series of in-depth case studies, in the largest NHS mental health trust in the UK to explore how social and economic needs are currently assessed and addressed. We found that assessment for social and economic needs varied across different domains; for example, family relationships were more consistently assessed than domains such as education and income. A range of support is available and provided by a patchwork of teams, including Community Mental Health Teams, other NHS teams, Local Authority staff, and many third sector organisations. However, what support is available is severely restricted and respondents highlighted a lack of adequate support in every domain we considered - employment, education and training, social participation and connectedness, family relationships, community support, social security, debt, income, housing, and trauma and victimisation, as well as additional domains including healthy eating, sex and relationships, and activities of daily living. Nevertheless, our case studies illustrate examples of approaches to addressing social and economic needs to improve outcomes for people with mental health problems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 98%
- Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study 97%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 95%
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 95%
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 95%
- A thematic analysis of Prevention of Future Death Reports for Children who died by suicide in England and Wales: January 2015 to November 2023 94%
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 97%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 97%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 98%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 96%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.