Back

How are social and economic needs assessed and addressed in mental health services? A service evaluation of the largest mental health trust in the UK

Greenburgh, A.; Baldwin, H.; Weir, H.; Asif, Z.; Laporte, D.; Bertram, M.; Crawford, A.; Duberry, G.; Lauter, S.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Lovelock, C.; Das-Munshi, J.; Morgan, C.

2025-05-12 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.05.12.25327421 medRxiv
Show abstract

There is an urgent need for services to address the social and economic adversities which contribute to the aetiology and outcomes of mental health problems. However, the implementation of interventions to do so is inconsistent, and entrenched cycles of poor mental health and social exclusion persist. We conducted a service evaluation survey of 28 staff working across community and inpatient teams, enhanced by a series of in-depth case studies, in the largest NHS mental health trust in the UK to explore how social and economic needs are currently assessed and addressed. We found that assessment for social and economic needs varied across different domains; for example, family relationships were more consistently assessed than domains such as education and income. A range of support is available and provided by a patchwork of teams, including Community Mental Health Teams, other NHS teams, Local Authority staff, and many third sector organisations. However, what support is available is severely restricted and respondents highlighted a lack of adequate support in every domain we considered - employment, education and training, social participation and connectedness, family relationships, community support, social security, debt, income, housing, and trauma and victimisation, as well as additional domains including healthy eating, sex and relationships, and activities of daily living. Nevertheless, our case studies illustrate examples of approaches to addressing social and economic needs to improve outcomes for people with mental health problems.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.1%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
10
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
20
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%