Artificial Intelligence in Outpatient Primary Care: A Scoping Review on Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
Iannone, S. L.; Johnson, K.; Kaur, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize clinical decision-making and significantly improve patient outcomes in outpatient primary care. AI technologies, including machine learning, deep learning, and transformers, enhance diagnostic accuracy, risk prediction, personalized treatment, workflow efficiency, clinical documentation, and continuous patient monitoring. However, despite rapid advancements, the extent of AI implementation in outpatient primary care remains unclear. This scoping review explores how AI functions, undergoes trials or integrates into non-urgent outpatient primary care settings. MethodsThis scoping review follows PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (ScR) guidelines. We searched five databases, including published and gray literature, to identify studies published between January 1, 2019, and November 22, 2024, using AI and primary care-related terms. We used Covidence, a web-based systematic review tool, to screen titles, abstracts, and full texts of English-language manuscripts. We then extracted data and categorized studies by research phase and AI application in primary care. ResultsWe screened 3,203 manuscripts and found 61 met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (26) focused on model development, while only eight reported clinical trial results. AI applications included provider support (5) and radiological disease diagnosis (1). Most studies examined clinical decision-making, disease diagnosis, and risk prediction, but none addressed provider cognitive support, workflow automation, or risk-adjusted paneling. Despite AIs potential, real-world implementation remains limited. ConclusionAI in primary care remains in the developmental stage, with minimal real-world use beyond ambient scribing, clinical decision support, and workflow automation. Researchers must collaborate with professional societies and industry partners to accelerate adoption, expand clinical trials, enhance AI education for providers and patients, facilitate model deployment, and conduct periodic assessments of real-world AI adoption trends to guide future integration.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical Opinions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 95%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 94%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 94%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Protocol for Development of a Reporting Guideline for Causal and Counterfactual Prediction Models 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.