Who uses mental health support forums, and why? Triangulating findings from surveys, interviews, and forum posts
Glossop, Z.; Lindroos Cermakova, A.; Marshall, P.; Rayson, P.; Robinson, H.; Semino, E.; Lobban, F.
Show abstract
Mental health services in the UK are increasingly pressured with long waiting times. Meanwhile, online forums for mental health, set up by charities, NHS services, and individual volunteers, have increased in popularity. Little is known, however, about who is using them and why. This study aimed to investigate this, using multiple methods to capture different types of users. A mixed-methods approach was used, with participants recruited from seven UK-based mental health forums. 791 forum users participated in a survey which was compared to the demographics of people accessing NHS Talking Therapies. 20 forum users took part in interviews, which were thematically analysed for reasons for use. Finally, the top keywords in the forum posts (a corpus of 28 million words) were calculated using the log likelihood test of statistical significance. One keyword was identified consistently across the forums, so its collocation profile was analysed. Surveys showed the forums were predominantly used by white, female, and younger people, though there was greater ethnic diversity and a higher proportion of non-binary people compared to NHS Talking Therapies. Thematic analysis of interviews indicated that people used forums because they are easily accessible, making it possible to overcome barriers to in-person support, such as the need to speak. Participants sought emotional support, advice, and connection with others experiencing similar challenges. The linguistic analysis showed "scared" was a common keyword across the forums, with common collocations being Im scared because and scared of. Reviewing the posts showed users tended to share fears over mental health symptoms and identity. Online forums serve as important alternative and complementary sources of mental health support, particularly for people who face discrimination or logistical barriers in accessing traditional services. These forums provide accessible, anonymous spaces for peer support, helping users to share fears and connect with others in similar situations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
- Exploring the experiences of loneliness in adults with mental health problems: a co-produced participatory qualitative interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 96%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 95%
- Use of the Internet and digital devices among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 94%
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 93%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 95%
- Healthcare workers’ mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of interview and social media data 93%
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 94%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.