Back

Who uses mental health support forums, and why? Triangulating findings from surveys, interviews, and forum posts

Glossop, Z.; Lindroos Cermakova, A.; Marshall, P.; Rayson, P.; Robinson, H.; Semino, E.; Lobban, F.

2025-05-12 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.05.11.25327409 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mental health services in the UK are increasingly pressured with long waiting times. Meanwhile, online forums for mental health, set up by charities, NHS services, and individual volunteers, have increased in popularity. Little is known, however, about who is using them and why. This study aimed to investigate this, using multiple methods to capture different types of users. A mixed-methods approach was used, with participants recruited from seven UK-based mental health forums. 791 forum users participated in a survey which was compared to the demographics of people accessing NHS Talking Therapies. 20 forum users took part in interviews, which were thematically analysed for reasons for use. Finally, the top keywords in the forum posts (a corpus of 28 million words) were calculated using the log likelihood test of statistical significance. One keyword was identified consistently across the forums, so its collocation profile was analysed. Surveys showed the forums were predominantly used by white, female, and younger people, though there was greater ethnic diversity and a higher proportion of non-binary people compared to NHS Talking Therapies. Thematic analysis of interviews indicated that people used forums because they are easily accessible, making it possible to overcome barriers to in-person support, such as the need to speak. Participants sought emotional support, advice, and connection with others experiencing similar challenges. The linguistic analysis showed "scared" was a common keyword across the forums, with common collocations being Im scared because and scared of. Reviewing the posts showed users tended to share fears over mental health symptoms and identity. Online forums serve as important alternative and complementary sources of mental health support, particularly for people who face discrimination or logistical barriers in accessing traditional services. These forums provide accessible, anonymous spaces for peer support, helping users to share fears and connect with others in similar situations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.4%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
5
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%