LiteMIL: A Computationally Efficient Transformer-Based MIL for Cancer Subtyping on Whole Slide Images.
Kussaibi, H.
Show abstract
PurposeAccurate cancer subtyping is crucial for effective treatment; however, it presents challenges due to overlapping morphology and variability among pathologists. Although deep learning (DL) methods have shown potential, their application to gigapixel whole slide images (WSIs) is often hindered by high computational demands and the need for efficient, context-aware feature aggregation. This study introduces LiteMIL, a computationally efficient transformer-based multiple instance learning (MIL) network combined with Phikon, a pathology-tuned self-supervised feature extractor, for robust and scalable cancer subtyping on WSIs. MethodsInitially, patches were extracted from TCGA-THYM dataset (242 WSIs, six subtypes) and subsequently fed in real-time to Phikon for feature extraction. To train MILs, features were arranged into uniform bags using a chunking strategy that maintains tissue context while increasing training data. LiteMIL utilizes a learnable query vector within an optimized multi-head attention module for effective feature aggregation. The models performance was evaluated against established MIL methods on the Thymic Dataset and three additional TCGA datasets (breast, lung, and kidney cancer). ResultsLiteMIL achieved 0.89 {+/-} 0.01 F1 score and 0.99 AUC on Thymic dataset, outperforming other MILs. LiteMIL demonstrated strong generalizability across the external datasets, scoring the best on breast and kidney cancer datasets. Compared to TransMIL, LiteMIL significantly reduces training time and GPU memory usage. Ablation studies confirmed the critical role of the learnable query and layer normalization in enhancing performance and stability. ConclusionLiteMIL offers a resource-efficient, robust solution. Its streamlined architecture, combined with the compact Phikon features, makes it suitable for integrating into routine histopathological workflows, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning 96%
- Attention-based whole-slide image compression achieves pathologist-level pre-screening of multi-organ routine histopathology biopsies 96%
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- tUbe net: a generalisable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation 95%
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 94%
- ImmuNet: A Segmentation-Free Machine Learning Pipeline for Immune Landscape Phenotyping in Tumors by Muliplex Imaging 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 95%
- Biologically-informed deep neural networks provide quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity in post-treatment glioblastoma 93%
- STPath: A Generative Foundation Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomics and Whole Slide Images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning 95%
- Graph perceiver network for lung tumor and bronchial premalignant lesion stratification from histopathology 94%
- Deep learning driven quantification of interstitial fibrosis in kidney biopsies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.