Back

Resources for molecular studies of unculturable obligate biotrophic fungal plant pathogens using their saprotrophic relatives

Loos, A.; Doykova, E.; Qian, J.; Kümmel, F.; Ibrahim, H.; Kiss, L.; Panstruga, R.; Kusch, S.

2025-05-14 genomics
10.1101/2025.05.08.652889 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Obligate biotrophic plant pathogens like the powdery mildew fungi commit to a closely dependent relationship with their plant hosts and have lost the ability to grow and reproduce independently. Thus, at present, these organisms are not amenable to in vitro cultivation, which is a prerequisite for effective genetic modification and functional molecular studies. Saprotrophic fungi of the family Arachnopezizaceae are the closest known extant relatives of the powdery mildew fungi and may hold great potential for studying genetic components of their obligate biotrophic lifestyle. Here, we established telomere-to-telomere genome assemblies for two representatives of this family, Arachnopeziza aurata and A. aurelia. Both species harbor haploid genomes that are composed of 16 chromosomes at a genome size of 43.1 and 46.3 million base-pairs, respectively, which, in contrast to most powdery mildew genomes that are transposon-enriched, show a repeat content below 5% and signs of repeat-induced point mutation (RIP). Both species could be grown in liquid culture and on solid standard media and were sensitive to common fungicides such as hygromycin and fenhexamid. We successfully expressed a red fluorescent protein and hygromycin resistance in A. aurata following polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation, demonstrating that Arachnopeziza species are amenable to genetic alterations that may include gene replacement, gene modification, and gene complementation. With this work, we established a potential model system that promises to sidestep the need for genetic modification of powdery mildew fungi by using Arachnopeziza species as a proxy to uncover the molecular functions of powdery mildew proteins.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.3%
2
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
4
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
14
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
22
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%