Back

α-Synuclein purification significantly impacts seed amplification assay performance and consistency

Al-Azzawi, Z. A. M.; Silver, N. R. G.; Niu, S.; Luo, W.; Shlaifer, I.; Ingelsson, M.; Hyman, B. T.; Trempe, J.-F.; Durcan, T.; Watts, J. C.; Fon, E. A.

2025-05-13 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.05.08.652548 bioRxiv
Show abstract

-Synuclein seed amplification assays are a promising diagnostic tool for synucleinopathies such as Parkinsons disease and multiple system atrophy. Standardized conditions are required to ensure a high degree of inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility when performing these assays. A significant issue that hinders the utility of seed amplification assays is the de novo aggregation propensity of the -synuclein substrate as well as inter-batch heterogeneity. While much work has focused on determining appropriate seed amplification assay buffer compositions as well as the type and amount of seed used, a robust comparison of -synuclein substrate purification methods has not been reported. We therefore compared the utility of recombinant -synuclein purified using four different methods as seed amplification assay substrates across two laboratories. Osmotic shock-purified -synuclein monomer substrate showed the lowest propensity for de novo aggregation, which translated into being the best substrate for seed amplification assay reactions seeded with -synuclein preformed fibrils or patient brain homogenates. Furthermore, osmotic shock -synuclein monomer showed the best inter-batch reproducibility compared to all other substrates tested. As -synuclein seed amplification assays continue to evolve and move towards adoption in the clinical realm, this work showcases the vital importance of standardizing the production and characterization of recombinant -synuclein substrate. We encourage the widespread adoption of osmotic shock -synuclein monomer as the universal substrate for seed amplification assays to maximize intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
4
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
6
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
11
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
20
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
22
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%