Hyperglycemia in pregnancy: A sensitivity analysis study of two recommended screening tests in Tanzania.
Kikula, A. I.; Ramaiya, K.; Sirili, N.; Mkonyi, M.; Msumi, R.; Macha, J.; Pembe, A. B.; Penalvo, J. L.; Benova, L.
Show abstract
Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HIP) is an entry point to a healthy pregnancy and childbirth for both the woman and child, and offers a window of opportunity for the prevention of cardio-metabolic complications over the life-course of the woman and newborn. In Tanzania, two different screening algorithms to identify women with HIP are recommended, with no clear understanding of which performs better. We aimed to determine the prevalence of hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) among antenatal care (ANC) attendees and the accuracy of HIP screening tests. A cross-sectional study design involving 970 women attending ANC clinic was done in two district hospitals (Mbagala Rangi Tatu and Kisarawe) of Tanzania between June and October 2024. Socio-demographic, obstetric characteristics, and anthropometric parameters were obtained from study participants. A checklist screening test (CST) for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined by the Tanzanian standard treatment guideline, was used. We tested for glycosuria and two-hour 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on every study participant. We conducted descriptive statistics and sensitivity analysis to determine the prevalence of HIP and assess the screening performance of CST and glycosuria test against OGTT using World Health Organization 2013 diagnostic criteria for GDM. The prevalence of HIP was 10% (7.9% GDM and 2.1% diabetes in pregnancy). Glycosuria test missed all women with GDM and could identify only 20% with diabetes in pregnancy. The CST had a sensitivity and specificity of 72.2% and 32.4%, respectively, while the glycosuria test had 4.1% and 97.1%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for both the CST 0.523 (0.48-0.57,95%CI) and glycosuria test 0.506 (0.49-0.53,95%CI) was low, indicating their poor discriminatory performance for HIP. One in every ten women had HIP. The CST is a better first-step screening test than the glycosuria test based on sensitivity.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Asymptomatic hypoglycemia among preterm newborns: a cross-sectional analysis 96%
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 95%
- Risk factors for anaemia among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study in Upper East Region, Ghana 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of parental anthropometry and gestational weight gain on intrauterine growth and neonatal outcomes: Findings from the MAI cohort study in rural India 96%
- Prevalence of, and risk factors for, diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh: Evidence from the national survey using a multilevel Poisson regression model with a robust variance 94%
- The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies complicated with COVID-19 in Kuwait 94%
- Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort 93%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a prospective, hospital-based registry of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: PregCovid Registry study 94%
- Seroprevalence and associated factors of maternal cytomegalovirus in Southern Ethiopia 94%
- Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.