Machine learning models for the prediction of COVID-19 prognosis in the primary health care setting
Barrot, J.; Cayla, J. A.; Mata-Cases, M.; Real, J.; Vlacho, B.; Franch-Nadal, J.; Mauricio, D.; COVID-19 Working Group in Primary Health Care,
Show abstract
Abstract textO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSThis study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes of COVID-19 at diagnosis in Primary Health Care (PHC). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study using the SIDIAP database, part of the PHC Information System of Catalonia. The analysis included COVID-19 cases diagnosed in patients aged 18 and older from March 2020 to September 2022. Follow-up was conducted for 90 days post-diagnosis or until death. Various machine learning models of differing complexities were used to predict short-term events, including mortality and hospital complications. Each model was tailored to maximize the predictive accuracy for poor outcomes, exploring algorithms such as Generalized Linear Models, flexible GLMs with Lasso, Gradient Boosting Models, and Support Vector Machines, with the model demonstrating the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) selected for optimal performance. ResultsA total of 2,162,187 COVID-19 cases were identified across five epidemic waves. Key predictors of short-term complications included age and the epidemic wave. Additional significant factors encompassed social deprivation (MEDEA), blood pressure, cardiovascular history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, and diabetes mellitus. The models exhibited high performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.73 to 0.95. A web application was developed to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes based on individual patient profiles (https://dapcat.shinyapps.io/CovidScore). ConclusionsIn addition to age and epidemic wave, predictors such as social deprivation, diabetes mellitus, obesity, COPD, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia significantly indicate poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients diagnosed in PHC, and the developed application facilitates risk quantification for individual patients.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 96%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy 95%
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering clinical risk factors and prediction of severe COVID-19: A machine learning approach based on UK Biobank data 94%
- Subphenotyping of COVID-19 patients at pre-admission towards anticipated severity stratification: an analysis of 778 692 Mexican patients through an age-gender unbiased meta-clustering technique 94%
- Initial Experience in Predicting the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients with COVID-19 Using a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 95%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 92%
- Artificial intelligence driven assessment of routinely collected healthcare data is an effective screening test for COVID-19 in patients presenting to hospital 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of an algorithm to estimate the risk of severe complications of COVID-19 to prioritise vaccination 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 94%
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.