Back

Molecular epidemiology of Theileria parva in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: Implications to the introduction of the Muguga Cocktail vaccine for East Coast Fever

Muleya, W.; Mulonga, S.; Mbao, V.; Kasereka, K. M.; Mbusa, K. H.; Namangala, B.; Salt, J.; Musoke, A. J.; Atuhaire, D. K.

2025-05-08 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.05.07.652749 bioRxiv
Show abstract

East Coast Fever (ECF) is one of the most economically important tick-borne diseases of cattle in Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa, caused by the intracellular protozoan parasite Theileria parva (T. parva). This study investigated the prevalence and genetic diversity of T. parva populations in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to inform immunization strategies against ECF. By employing PCR and DNA sequencing techniques, in conjunction with surveys assessing Knowledge and Practices, as well as conducting an immunization and field challenge trial, the findings suggest the existence of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks in the provinces of South-Kivu, North Kivu, and Ituri. This underscores a possible threat of disease transmission in these areas. Molecular analyses uncovered diverse T. parva populations with varying antigenic profiles, challenging the assumption of uniformity despite Muguga cocktail-like appearances. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses suggested limited similarity between T. parva populations and the Muguga cocktail vaccine. Microsatellite analysis and field challenge trials supported the notion of multiple populations, highlighting the current vaccines limitations against field strains. This study has the potential to significantly contribute to understanding T. parva dynamics in the region, emphasizing the complexities of vaccine strain selection and stressing the importance of continuous monitoring and adaptive control strategies in the face of evolving parasite populations.

Published in BMC Veterinary Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.