Back

Transcriptomic and physiological responses of soybean plants subjected to a combination of water deficit and heat stress under field conditions

Sinha, R.; Pelaez-Vico, M. A.; Dhakal, S.; Ghani, A.; Myers, R.; Verma, M.; Shostak, B.; Ogden, A.; Krueger, C. B.; Costa Netto, J. R.; Zandalinas, S. I.; Joshi, T.; Fritschi, F. B.; Mittler, R.

2025-05-11 plant biology
10.1101/2025.05.07.652738 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Water deficit, heat stress, and a combination of water deficit and heat stress are highly disruptive to crop yield worldwide. Unfortunately, the frequency and intensity of these conditions is gradually increasing due to climate change. Previous studies of water deficit and heat stress combination were primarily conducted under controlled growth conditions, revealing that the combination of water deficit and heat stress resulted in the activation of unique stress responses and acclimation pathways. However, whether similar responses to stress combination occur in the field remained largely unknown. Here we report on a two-year field study in which the transcriptomic and physiological responses of vegetative and reproductive tissues of soybean (Glycine max) to water deficit, heat treatment and their combination were studied. Our findings reveal that the transcriptomic responses of soybeans grown in the field are different from those grown under controlled growth chamber conditions. These differences were especially noticeable in plants subjected to the heat or water deficit treatments, and less in plants subjected to the stress combination. In addition, we report that differential transpiration between leaves and pods, that was originally discovered in plants grown under controlled growth conditions, occurs in field grown soybeans in response to heat stress, as well as heat stress combined with water deficit. We hope that the transcriptomic datasets generated by our study will contribute to future studies of crop responses to different stresses in the field, as well as highlight the need for more omics studies of plants grown under field conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
9.8%
3
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.9%
5
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
7
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
16
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
18
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%