Back

An inductive, supervised approach for predicting gene--disease associations using phenotype ontologies

Bakheet, S.; Zhapa-Camacho, F.; Hoehndorf, R.

2025-05-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.07.652682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationPredicting gene-disease associations (GDAs) is the problem to determine which gene is associated with a disease. The problem can be framed as a ranking problem where genes are ranked based on a set of phenotypes using a measure of phenotype similarity. When phenotypes are described using phenotype ontologies, ontology-based semantic similarity measures are used. Traditional semantic similarity measures use only the ontology taxonomy. Recent methods based on ontology embeddings compare phenotypes in latent space; these methods can use all ontology axioms as well as a supervised signal, but are inherently transductive, i.e., queries must already be known at the time of learning embeddings, and therefore these methods do not generalize to novel diseases (sets of phenotypes) at inference time. ResultsWe developed an inductive method for ranking genes based on a set of phenotypes. Our method first uses a graph projection to map axioms from phenotype ontologies to a graph structure, and then uses ontology embeddings to create latent representations of phenotypes. We use an explicit aggregation strategy to combine phenotype embeddings into representations of genes or diseases, allowing us to generalize to novel sets of phenotypes. We also develop a method to make the phenotype embeddings and the similarity measure task-specific by including a supervised signal from known gene-disease associations. We apply our method to mouse models of human disease and demonstrate that we can significantly improve over inductive baseline measures, and reach a performance similar to transductive methods for predicting gene-disease associations while being more general. Availability and Implementationhttps://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/ISGDA Contactrobert.hoehndorf@kaust.edu.sa

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.