Back

Bridging 3D Molecular Structures and Artificial Intelligence by a Conformation Description Language

Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, Z.; Zeng, C.; Jiang, X.; Cao, D.; Xiong, Z.; Zheng, M.

2025-05-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.07.652440 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial intelligence, particularly language models (LMs), is reshaping research paradigms across scientific domains. In the fields of chemistry and pharmacy, chemical language models (CLMs) have achieved remarkable success in two-dimensional (2D) molecular modeling tasks by leveraging one-dimensional (1D) representations of molecules, such as SMILES and SELFIES. However, extending these successes to three-dimensional (3D) molecular modeling remains a significant challenge, largely due to the absence of effective 1D representations for capturing 3D molecular structures. To address this gap, we introduce ConfSeq, a novel molecular conformation description language that integrates SMILES with internal coordinates including dihedral angles, bond angles, and pseudo-chirality. This design naturally ensures SE(3) invariance, while preserving the human readability and conciseness characteristic of SMILES. ConfSeq enables the reformulation of a range of 3D molecular modeling tasks, such as molecular conformation prediction, 3D molecular generation, and 3D molecular representation, into sequence modeling problems. Then, by simply employing a standard Transformer architecture, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on various benchmark sets. Furthermore, compared to widely used diffusion-based approaches in 3D molecular modeling, the ConfSeq-based method offers unique advantages in inference efficiency, generation controllability, and enables scoring of generated molecules. We believe that ConfSeq can serve as a foundational tool, advancing the development of sequence-based 3D molecular modeling methods.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.