Back

UniCell: Towards a Unified Solution for Cell Annotation, Nomenclature Harmonization, Atlas Construction in Single-Cell Transcriptomics

Hu, L.; Chen, Q.; Qiu, P.; Qin, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, L.; Xia, T.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, S.; Li, Y.

2025-05-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.06.652331 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Standardizing cell type annotations across single-cell RNA-seq datasets remains a major challenge due to inconsistencies in nomenclature, variation in annotation granularity, and the presence of rare or previously unseen populations. We present UniCell, a hierarchical annotation framework that combines Cell Ontology structure with transcriptomic data for scalable, interpretable, and ontology-aware cell identity inference. UniCell leverages a multi-task architecture that jointly optimizes local and global classifiers, yielding coherent predictions across multiple levels of the ontology-defined hierarchy. When benchmarked across 20 human and mouse datasets, UniCell consistently outperformed state-of-the-art tools, including CellTypist, scANVI, OnClass, and SingleR, in annotation performance, and sensitivity to low-abundance populations. In disease settings, UniCell effectively identified previously unseen cell types through confidence-guided novelty detection. Applied to 45 human and 23 mouse tissue atlases, UniCell enabled cross-dataset and cross-species harmonization by embedding cells into a unified latent space aligned with Cell Ontology structure. Moreover, when used to supervise single-cell foundation models, UniCell substantially improved downstream annotation accuracy, rare cell detection, and hierarchical consistency. Together, these results establish UniCell as a generalizable framework that supports high-resolution annotation, nomenclature standardization, and atlas-level integration, providing a scalable and biologically grounded solution for single-cell transcriptomic analysis across diverse biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.