Back

Impact of billing policy changes on telehealth use in Ontario: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study.

Stamenova, V.; Chu, C.; Fang, J.; Bhattacharyya, O.; Bhatia, R. S.; Tadrous, M.

2025-05-07 health policy
10.1101/2025.05.06.25327128 medRxiv
Show abstract

As telehealth is being integrated into a regularly functioning system, policy makers have been adding some restrictions related to its use (e.g. modalities and pre-existing in-person relationship rules). We explored how the new policies impacted the levels of use across telehealth modalities and if the impact varied across sociodemographic and chronic condition groups of patients. This is a population-based repeated cross-sectional study examining all outpatient visits in Ontario, Canada on a weekly basis from the week of January 1st, 2018 until the week of December 25th, 2023. We used linked health administrative databases of health services provided to all Ontario residents who are insured through the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP). We examined the total number of visits and the rates of in-person and telehealth visits per 1000 persons per week. Across Ontario, there were 115 046 536 telehealth visits during the study time period (26.4% of all ambulatory care). There was a 6.7% reduction in telehealth and a 10% reduction in the number of physicians using telehealth at the beginning of December 2022 when the new policies were introduced. This was in the absence of a reduction of total ambulatory visits. The impact varied across medical specialties, patient age groups, rurality and chronic conditions, but seemingly not across sex or income quintiles. The use of video increased slightly over the study period with 1 in 4 telehealth visits occurring over video. While the policy changes led to an overall reduction in telehealth use, the total ambulatory visits did not change, suggesting a shift of care from virtual to in-person. The adoption of video increased, but future studies should focus on exploring whether there are clear benefits of using video over telephone, as certain groups of patients may be impacted more than others. Author SummaryAs healthcare systems returned to normal functioning after the pandemic, rules around the use of telehealth (use of telephone and video to provide care) changed. For example, in Ontario, Canada, physicians were paid on par for video visits as in-person visits, but telephone visits were paid at 85% of the rate. In addition, the government introduced requirements related to whether a patient has been seen in-person by a physician within the last two years prior to a telehealth visit. Our study explored the impact of these changes using physician billing data. Overall, there was a 6.7% reduction in telehealth and a 10% reduction in the number of physicians using telehealth when the new policies were introduced in Dec, 2022. The impact varied across medical specialties, patient age groups, rurality and chronic conditions, but seemingly not across sex or income quintiles. Overall outpatient visits were not impacted, suggesting that care shifted back to in-person. The majority of telehealth still occurred over telephone, despite a slight increase in the use of video after the policies were introduced.

Published in Health Policy and Technology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.8%
2
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.8%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
7
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
18
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%