Understanding the implementation of a smoking cessation intervention for people experiencing homelessness: A process evaluation of the SCeTCH trial
Brown, R.; Ford, A.; Reid, L.; McMillan, L. E.; Soar, K.; Pesola, F.; Notley, C. J.; Ward, E.; Gardner, B.; Varley, A.; Mair, C.; Lennon, J.; Brierley, J.; Edwards, A.; Mitchell, D.; Robson, D.; Hajek, P.; Tyler, A.; Parrott, S.; Li, J.; Bauld, L.; Cox, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionCigarette smoking is higher in people experiencing homelessness. The Smoking Cessation Trial in Centres for Homelessness (SCeTCH) was a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial in 32 services for homelessness across Great Britain. We compared the provision of an e-cigarette (EC) starter kit with usual care (UC). Findings from the process evaluation, focusing on intervention implementation from the perspectives of staff at EC centres and researchers are reported. MethodsThe process evaluation involved qualitative interviews with staff (N=16) and participants (N=31), observations of intervention delivery (N=32), fidelity checklists (N=25) (at EC sites), training evaluations (N=160) and data collected within the main trial (at both EC and UC sites). Findings here are from EC sites. ResultsFindings suggest that it is feasible to deliver a smoking cessation intervention in these services. The EC intervention was largely acceptable to staff and the training we delivered was highly rated. Individual intervention components were delivered with high fidelity, with no differences by centre size or location, suggesting high transferability. ConclusionChallenges to future delivery of similar interventions may stem from lack of wider staff team buy-in and support, as well as challenges to time available when faced with more immediate service user needs.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Describing the inputs, activities and outputs of "10,000 Lives", a coordinated regional smoking cessation initiative in Central Queensland, Australia 94%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 94%
- Smoking in social housing among adults in England, 2015-2020: a nationally representative survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Online Training in Improving Primary Care Doctors Competency in Brief Tobacco Interventions: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of WHO Modules in Delta State, Nigeria 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 94%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 93%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial 93%
- Qualitative Study of Acceptability, Benefits, and Feasibility of a Food-based Intervention among Participants and Stakeholders of the RATIONS Trial 92%
- Improving patient-centred counselling skills among lay healthcare workers in South Africa using the Thusa-Thuso motivational interviewing training and support program 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
- Views about integrating smoking cessation treatment within psychological services for patients with common mental illness: a multi-perspective qualitative study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.