Back

Evaluation of a Contactless Sleep Monitoring Device for Sleep Stage Detection against Home Polysomnography in a Healthy Population

Stefanos, M.-A.; De Laboulaye, G.; Campo, D.; De Gourcuff, M.; Escourrou, P.; Matrot, B.; Islind, A. S.; Geoffroy, P. A.

2025-05-09 health informatics
10.1101/2025.05.06.25326860 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSSleep is essential for overall health and well-being, but assessing sleep architecture and quality is often costly and time-consuming, relying primarily on polysomnography (PSG). Wearable and nearable devices offer potential alternatives, but they regularly lack rigorous validation, especially in real-world settings. ObjectivesThis study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of Withings Sleep Analyzer (WSA), a contactless sleep monitoring device, compared to PSG in a home setting using a large and diverse cohort of healthy individuals. MethodsA total of 117 participants (69 women; 39.9 {+/-} 11.4 years, mean {+/-} std) underwent home-based polysomnography (PSG) and simultaneous WSA recording. Data analysis focused on evaluating sleep-wake distinction and sleep stage identification using standard classification metrics. ResultsWSA demonstrates high sensitivity (93%) for sleep detection and moderate sensitivity (73%) for wakefulness, achieving an overall accuracy of 87% for sleep-wake distinction. The device showed consistent performance across various demographic subgroups, including different age, BMI, mattress and sleep arrangements (with or without bed partner) categories. Challenges were noted in accurately classifying specific sleep stages, particularly in distinguishing between light and deep sleep, with a mean accuracy of 63% and a Cohens Kappa of 0.49. The WSA tended to overestimate total sleep time (+20 min) and light sleep (+1h21 min) while underestimating REM (-15 min) and deep sleep (-46 min) durations. Disagreements between expert reviewers, particularly between light and deep sleep stages, mirrored in part the WSAs misclassifications. Participants reported significantly altered perceived sleep quality during the night with the PSG, suggesting potential discomfort during sleep. ConclusionsWSA offers a promising approach to sleep monitoring in natural home environments. Being contactless and placed under the mattress, the WSAs allows for long-term monitoring of sleep measures. It shows competitive performance in sleep-wake and sleep stage identification compared to other consumer devices. Progress in wearable and nearable devices is necessary to enhance their accuracy to better support the monitoring of populations with strongly impaired sleep, although limited by an imperfect gold standard. This work also emphasizes the importance of using large, diverse, and challenging datasets, as well as the need for a standardized methodology for accurate sleep stage classification.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
8
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
9
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%