Back

Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Interoceptive Accuracy Scale and Interoceptive Attention Scale

Mulder, J.; Elferink-Gemser, M. T.; De Vries, J. D.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. C.

2025-05-07 public and global health
10.1101/2025.05.06.25326009 medRxiv
Show abstract

Interoception, the perception of internal bodily signals, is thought to play a key role in health behavior. Interoceptive domains (e.g., accuracy and attention) are associated with mental disorders in various ways, underscoring the need for specific measures for different interoceptive domains. To allow for studying interoceptive domains in the Dutch population, the current study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of Dutch translations of the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale (IAS-D) and Interoceptive Attention Scale (IATS-D). In a sample of 779 participants (mean age 52.98 {+/-} 16.47, 49.6% female), the IAS-D showed good internal consistency ( = 0.89) with a four-factor structure according to the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = 0.816, TLI = 0.788, RMSEA = 0.084). The IAS-D had significant negative relations to the Interoceptive Confusion Questionnaire ({beta} = -0.638, p < 0.001), depression ({beta} = -0.298, p < 0.001), and alexithymia ({beta} = 0.528, p < 0.001). The IATS-D showed good internal consistency ( = 0.94) with a three-factor structure according to the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = 0.852, TLI = 0.833, RMSEA = 0.100). The IATS-D had significant positive relations with the Interoceptive Confusion Questionnaire ({beta} = 0.481, p < 0.001), Body Perception Questionnaire ({beta} = 0.207, p < 0.001), depression ({beta} = 0.377, p < 0.001), and alexithymia ({beta} = 0.528, p < 0.001). The IAS-D and IATS-D are considered reliable and valid instruments for assessing self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention in Dutch-speaking populations, supporting public health research on the role of interoception in health behavior. HighlightsO_LIInteroceptive domains associate with mental disorders in various ways C_LIO_LISpecific measures for interoceptive domains are needed C_LIO_LIIAS-D and IATS-D are reliable and valid instruments C_LIO_LIIAS-D and IATS-D can distinguish between interoceptive domains C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
2
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
4
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
10
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%