Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Interoceptive Accuracy Scale and Interoceptive Attention Scale
Mulder, J.; Elferink-Gemser, M. T.; De Vries, J. D.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. C.
Show abstract
Interoception, the perception of internal bodily signals, is thought to play a key role in health behavior. Interoceptive domains (e.g., accuracy and attention) are associated with mental disorders in various ways, underscoring the need for specific measures for different interoceptive domains. To allow for studying interoceptive domains in the Dutch population, the current study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of Dutch translations of the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale (IAS-D) and Interoceptive Attention Scale (IATS-D). In a sample of 779 participants (mean age 52.98 {+/-} 16.47, 49.6% female), the IAS-D showed good internal consistency ( = 0.89) with a four-factor structure according to the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = 0.816, TLI = 0.788, RMSEA = 0.084). The IAS-D had significant negative relations to the Interoceptive Confusion Questionnaire ({beta} = -0.638, p < 0.001), depression ({beta} = -0.298, p < 0.001), and alexithymia ({beta} = 0.528, p < 0.001). The IATS-D showed good internal consistency ( = 0.94) with a three-factor structure according to the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = 0.852, TLI = 0.833, RMSEA = 0.100). The IATS-D had significant positive relations with the Interoceptive Confusion Questionnaire ({beta} = 0.481, p < 0.001), Body Perception Questionnaire ({beta} = 0.207, p < 0.001), depression ({beta} = 0.377, p < 0.001), and alexithymia ({beta} = 0.528, p < 0.001). The IAS-D and IATS-D are considered reliable and valid instruments for assessing self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention in Dutch-speaking populations, supporting public health research on the role of interoception in health behavior. HighlightsO_LIInteroceptive domains associate with mental disorders in various ways C_LIO_LISpecific measures for interoceptive domains are needed C_LIO_LIIAS-D and IATS-D are reliable and valid instruments C_LIO_LIIAS-D and IATS-D can distinguish between interoceptive domains C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire 97%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 93%
- Mindfulness Training Alters Resting-State EEG Dynamics in Novice Practitioners via Mindful Breathing and Body-scan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cultural Validation of Acculturation Measures: Expanding the East Asian Acculturation Framework for Global Applicability 95%
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 94%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gray and White Matter Networks Predict Mindfulness and Mind Wandering Traits: A Data Fusion Machine Learning Approach 93%
- Recalled parental bonding interacts with oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism in modulating anxiety and avoidance in adult relationships 91%
- The Big Five personality traits and CNS arousal in the resting state 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The cerebellum as a moderator of negative bias of facial expression processing in depressive patients 91%
- Depression polygenic scores are associated with major depressive disorder diagnosis and depressive episode in Mexican adolescents 90%
- Anhedonia, Depression, and Symptom Severity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Discernment of Mediator and Outcome Measurement in the PACE trial 94%
- Does symptom perception after negative affect induction differ between physically ill and healthy individuals? An experimental study within SOMA.CK 93%
- A Pattern-Based Heart Rate Variability Approach in Somatic Symptom Disorder: Evidence from the SOMA.SSD Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.