Back

Prioritization of Deleterious Mutations Improves Genomic Prediction and Increases the Rate of Genetic Gain in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a Simulation Study

Cordoba Novoa, H. A.; Hoyos-Villegas, V.

2025-05-09 genetics
10.1101/2025.05.05.652208 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The study of mutations is fundamental to understanding evolution, domestication, and genetics. Characterizing mutations has the potential to accelerate breeding programs through selection and purging of deleterious mutations (DelMut). Here, we investigated how predicting DelMut in breeding populations can improve genomic prediction (GP) and inform strategies to increase the rate of genetic gain. DelMut were annotated in three independent common bean populations using a previously developed random forest (RF) model incorporating phylogenetic and protein information. Deleterious scores from the RF model were mostly around 0.25, with the top 1% (highly DelMut) of variants scoring between 0.78 - 0.82 among populations. All populations showed variation in the number of highly DelMut per line (max. 13 - 197) and in genetic load. We assessed the impact of incorporating a priori information for variant prioritization and weighting based on predicted deleteriousness in GP models for yield and flowering time. Stochastic simulations were conducted to evaluate how different mating schemes based variable numbers of DelMut per parent affect genetic gain. Variants with higher predicted scores had significantly different effect distributions compared to random or lower-scored markers. Yield predictions were 4.47-12.3% more accurate when markers were weighted by effect and deleterious score; no consistent improvement was observed for flowering time. Simulated breeding cycles showed that selecting parents with fewer highly DelMut consistently increases the rate of genetic gain. These results highlight the potential of DelMut information for variant prioritization and the optimization of common bean breeding programs. The approaches we developed can be assessed in other species to improve the efficacy of crop improvement. Key messages- Predicted deleterious mutations have different distributions of effects based on population composition. - Variant prioritization and differential weighing of markers based on effects and deleterious scores can improve the prediction of yield. - Favoring mating schemes between parents with fewer highly deleterious mutations can increase the rate of genetic gain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.7%
2
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
4
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
9
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
28
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%