Machine Learning Meets Pharmacokinetics: A Comparative Analysis of Predictive Models for Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles
Jost, F.; Giegerich, C.; Grebner, C.; Matter, H.; Cordes, H.
Show abstract
Predicting pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from molecular structures constitutes a significant advancement in pharmaceutical research with substantial implications for expediting the entire drug discovery process. Our investigation presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of five distinct methodological frameworks for predicting rat plasma concentration-time profiles: four approaches that integrate mechanistic modeling with computational techniques, and one approach employing pure machine learning (ML) architecture without physiological constraints. As reference (1), we used a method that predicts non-compartmental analysis (NCA) parameters to predict plasma PK profiles with a one-compartmental PK model (NCA-ML). Alternative approaches include: (2) a physiologically based PK (PBPK) model utilizing ML-predicted in vitro characteristics; (3) CMT-ML, where neural networks predict compartmental PK model parameters; (4) CMT-PINN, employing physics-informed neural networks; and (5) PURE-ML, using decision trees to predict concentration values at specific timepoints based on predicted volume of distribution and clearance. Assessment using multiple performance metrics demonstrated that the CMT-PINN approach achieved superior predictivity for PK profiles. Models trained directly on concentration-time, rather than derived PK parameters, delivered markedly improved predictive performance, particularly when working with limited training datasets. Our findings confirm the viability of predicting PK behavior from molecular structures before synthesis, representing a significant advancement for subsequent design. Implementation of these computational approaches enables informed compound selection early in the discovery pipeline, concentrating valuable resources for advanced preclinical investigations on only the most promising candidates, with anticipated beneficial effects on overall development timelines.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DigiLoCS: A Leap Forward in Predictive Organ-on-Chip Simulations 96%
- Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians 92%
- Enabling Transparent Toxicokinetic Modeling for Public Health Risk Assessment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Allosteric binders of ACE2 are promising anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents 92%
- Rapid, open-source, and automated quantification of the head twitch response in C57BL/6J mice using DeepLabCut and Simple Behavioral Analysis 92%
- Target-driven design of a coumarinyl chalcone scaffold based novel EF2 Kinase inhibitor suppresses breast cancer growth in vivo 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning driven acceleration of biopharmaceutical formulation development using Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo) 95%
- Intense bitterness of molecules: machine learning for expediting drug discovery 93%
- Network-based estimation of therapeutic efficacy and adverse reaction potential for prioritisation of anti-cancer drug combinations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlling astrocyte-mediated synaptic pruning signals for schizophrenia drug repurposing with Deep Graph Networks 92%
- Protein Domain-Based Prediction of Compound-Target Interactions and Experimental Validation on LIM Kinases 92%
- A regularized functional regression model enabling transcriptome-wide dosage-dependent association study of cancer drug response 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.