Deep learning inference of miRNA expression from bulk and single-cell mRNA expression
Ripan, R. C.; Athaya, T.; Li, x.; Hu, H.
Show abstract
Understanding the activity of miRNA in individual cells presents a challenge due to the limitations of single-cell technologies in capturing miRNAs. To tackle this obstacle, we introduce two deep learning models: Cross-Modality (CM) and Single-Modality (SM). These models utilize encoder-decoder architectures to predict miRNA expression at the bulk and single-cell levels from mRNA data. We compared CM and SM with a state-of-the-art approach, miRSCAPE, using both bulk and single-cell datasets. We found that both CM and SM outperformed miRSCAPE in terms of accuracy. We also observed that integrating miRNA target information led to a significant enhancement in performance compared to using all genes. These models offer valuable tools for predicting miRNA expression from single-cell mRNA data.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Robust and Scalable Graph Neural Network for Accurate Single Cell Classification 96%
- SMNN: Batch Effect Correction for Single-cell RNA-seq data via Supervised Mutual Nearest Neighbor Detection 96%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Prediction from Histology jointly through Transformer and Graph Neural Networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- CellFM: a large-scale foundation model pre-trained on transcriptomics of 100 million human cells 96%
- Deep autoencoder for interpretable tissue-adaptive deconvolution and cell-type-specific gene analysis 96%
- FastCCC: A permutation-free framework for scalable, robust, and reference-based cell-cell communication analysis in single cell transcriptomics studies 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- BERMUDA: A novel deep transfer learning method for single-cell RNA sequencing batch correction reveals hidden high-resolution cellular subtypes 96%
- Identifying tumor cells at the single cell level 95%
- Heterogeneous pseudobulk simulation enables realistic benchmarking of cell-type deconvolution methods 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.