Healthcare professionals and point-of-care innovation: changing views and emerging trends
Vigeant, T.; Riddell, R.; Ofosuhene, B.; White, G.; Montenario, M.; Wang, Z.; Orwig, T.; Tatere, H.; Orwig, T.; Buchholz, B.; Dunlap, D.; McManus, D. D.; Gaba, A.; Hafer, N.
Show abstract
Point-of-care technologies (POCTs) have grown increasingly prevalent in clinical and at-home settings, offering various rapid diagnostic capabilities. This study presents findings from a nationwide survey of healthcare providers, including physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals, conducted between November 2023 and January 2024, capturing clinician perceptions of POCTs. This survey builds upon previous surveys from 2019 to 2021, and the data reflects a shift in attitudes toward a more neutral standpoint with fewer perceived benefits and concerns. A total of 159 responses were analyzed. Core priorities, including accuracy, ease of use, and availability, remain consistently valued over the years. However, several perceived benefits, including continuous patient monitoring, diagnostic certainty, and patient management exhibited significant declines in agreement compared to previous years. This decline may be attributed to the increasing real-world experience with POCTs and the associated concerns surrounding inconsistent or inaccurate patient use, particularly in at-home settings. POCTs are now used for broader applications. Despite this, clinician perceptions of POCTs abilities to enhance patient-provider communication remained stable. The results suggest a tempered outlook among providers. Evolving concerns may reflect heightened expectations and greater scrutiny as these technologies become commonplace. Agreement that POCTs may undermine clinical expertise increases, while concerns related to reimbursement and usability declines. Pilot questions related to artificial intelligence and machine learning were introduced; results indicated moderate openness to adopting AI-enhanced POCTs, particularly with tools offering novel clinical insights. While the results provide valuable insight into an evolving landscape of clinician perceptions, limitations include a smaller sample size than in prior years and missing demographic data from a subset of participants. Future surveys will further integrate AI/ML-related questions while prioritizing broader demographic and geographic reach. These trends underscore the importance of aligning the needs and expectations of stakeholders to enhance the clinical value of POCTs and improve patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 95%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 94%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 94%
- How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective 92%
- Telemedicine Ready or Not? a cross-sectional assessment of telemedicine maturity of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 94%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 93%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.