Back

RFA-U-Net: A Foundation Model-Driven Approach for Accurate Choroid Segmentation in OCT Imaging

Hayati, A.; Arian, R.; Saeedizadeh, N.; Rojas, W.; Agrawal, R.; Kafieh, R.

2025-05-05 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.05.03.25326923 medRxiv
Show abstract

The choroid layer plays a critical role in maintaining outer retinal health and is implicated in numerous vision-threatening diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic macular edema. While Enhanced-Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography (EDI-OCT) enables detailed visualization of the choroid, accurate manual segmentation remains timeconsuming and subjective. In this study, we introduce RFA-U-Net, a novel deep learning model designed for precise choroid segmentation in OCT images. Building upon RETFound--a foundation model pre-trained on 1.6 million retinal images--RFA-U-Net retains its encoder to leverage rich hierarchical feature representations while addressing its general-purpose segmentation limitations through three key innovations: (1) attention gates to dynamically emphasize choroid-specific features, (2) feature fusion strategies to maintain contextual integrity during decoding, and (3) standard U-Net up-convolutions to ensure accurate boundary reconstruction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RFA-U-Net outperforms pre-trained CNN-U-Net variants and state-of-the-art (SOTA) choroidal segmentation models. Specifically, it achieves a Dice score of 95.04 {+/-} 0.25% and a Jaccard index of 90.59 {+/-} 0.30% on an independent test set, highlighting its superior accuracy and robustness, particularly in challenging clinical scenarios with variable OCT image quality. These findings underscore the potential of combining foundation models and attention mechanisms to advance precision and reliability in ophthalmic diagnostics, paving the way for scalable and efficient deployment in clinical and community-based screening settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.