Back

Simultaneous particle tracking, phase retrieval and point spread function reconstruction

Fazel, M.; Hoseini, R.; Mahmoodi, M.; Xu, L. W. Q.; Saurabh, A.; Kilic, Z.; Antolin, J.; Scrudders, K. L.; Shepherd, D. P.; Low-Nam, S. T.; Huang, F.; Presse, S.

2025-05-06 biophysics
10.1101/2025.05.02.651986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

3D tracking and localization of particles, typically fluorescently labeled biomolecules, provides a direct means of monitoring cellular transport and communication. However, sample-induced wavefront distortions of emitted fluorescent light as it passes through the sample and onto the detector often yield point spread function (PSF) aberrations, presenting an important challenge to 3D particle tracking using pre-calibrated PSFs. PSF calibration is typically performed outside cellular samples, ignoring sample-induced aberrations, which can result in localization errors on the order of tens to hundreds of nanometers, ultimately compromising sub-diffraction limited tracking. In practice, correcting sample-induced aberrations currently requires sample-specific hardware adjustments, such as adaptive optics. Yet, information on sample-induced aberrations and PSF shape can be directly decoded from data collected using a 3D imaging setup. To this end, we propose a framework for simultaneous particle tracking, pupil function learning, and PSF reconstruction directly from the input data themselves. To accomplish this, we operate within a Bayesian paradigm, placing continuous 2D priors on all possible pupil phase and amplitudes warranted by the data without limiting ourselves to a finite Zernike set-thereby allowing capture of intricate pupil phase details. We benchmark our framework using a wide range of synthetic and experimental data from static to diffusing particles, and generalize to multiple diffusing particles with overlapping PSFs. Further, as a result of simultaneous particle tracking, phase retrieval, and PSF reconstruction, we retrieve the pupil phase with errors smaller than 10% under a range of realistic scenarios, while restoring sub-diffraction limited localization precisions of 10-25 nm and 20-50 nm in lateral and axial directions, respectively.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
11
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
21
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
25
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%