Back

Fifty shades of white fish: DNA barcoding reveals widespread misidentification in sushi restaurants from Southern Brazil

Almeron-Souza, F.; Tresoldi Goncalves, L.; Fagundes, N. J. R.

2025-05-05 genetics
10.1101/2025.05.02.651977 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ambiguous commercial naming of fish can mislead consumers and obscure species identity. "White fish" is a widely used yet unregulated commercial name in sushi restaurants across Brazil, creating opportunities for species misidentification. This study used DNA barcoding to assess the accuracy of species labeling for "white fish" sushi in Porto Alegre, Southern Brazil, a major urban center with a high density of sushi restaurants. A total of 53 "white fish" sushi samples were collected from 50 restaurants. Molecular identification successfully assigned 41 samples to nine distinct fish species, while seven samples were identified at the genus level. In eight cases (20.5%), the species name provided by restaurant staff did not match the molecular identification, meaning that one in five restaurants supplied incorrect information. We found that lower sushi prices were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of misidentification (P=0.035, OR = 0.53, 95% CI: [0.17, 1.03]). Among the eight cases of species substitution, three included the substitution of "linguado" (flounder; Paralichthys spp. or Syacium spp.) for "panga" (striped catfish; Pangasianodon hypophthalmus), and another three revealed the substitution of "prego" (escolar; Lepidocybium flavobrunneum or Ruvettus pretiosus) for "meca" (swordfish; Xiphias gladius). The remaining two cases revealed the swapping between "tilapia" (tilapia; Oreochromis spp.) and "prego" (escolar). These findings highlight the need for stricter seafood labeling regulations and enforcement to improve consumer transparency and sustainability. HighlightsO_LI"White fish" corresponded to at least ten different fish species; C_LIO_LIOne in five restaurants provided incorrect information regarding the fish species identification; C_LIO_LIHigh-value species were replaced with less economically valuable ones; C_LIO_LILower sushi prices were associated with a higher likelihood of misidentification; C_LIO_LIBrazilian legislation should regulate the commercial use of the term "white fish". C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.2%
2
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
5
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
6
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
7
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
10
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
11
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
19
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%