Back

CaneCestry : A Web-based Toolbox for Efficient Pedigree Analysis and Visualization.

Taylor, Z.; Blanchard, B.; Dhungana, A.; Kimbeng, C.

2025-05-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.02.651868 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic variability is the lifeblood of all breeding programs. This variability is acted on via selection to identify elite progeny that can be utilized agronomically or exploited as parents. Sugarcane breeders are tasked with creating optimal genetic variation through crossing. Prior knowledge of pedigree and parental performance allows breeders to discern which crosses to prioritize, since the time to make crossing decisions and the space to evaluate tens and thousands of progenies are both limited resources in sugarcane variety development programs. In this project, we have developed a user-friendly, web-based platform called CaneCestry that provides a wide range of tools utilizing pedigree information. CaneCestry can be utilized to generate family trees for parents involved in a potential cross, enabling the breeder to efficiently display and visualize the lineage of the genotypes contained within. Kinship matrices are a powerful numerical representation of relationships between individuals in a population. While the calculation of kinship can be computationally intensive, CaneCestry is built upon a framework allowing for efficient cloud-based computation. These numerical representations of kinship elucidate the relatedness of potential parents, allowing the breeder to make the most informed crosses while avoiding inbreeding depression. Kinship matrices can also be utilized to enhance prediction models by adding the relatedness of the involved genotypes as a covariate, accounting for additive genetic control of traits. CaneCestry provides a comprehensive, web-based set of tools available in the office and field, enabling sugarcane breeders to utilize pedigree information in all stages of their breeding program.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.