Back

An adaptive, continuous-learning framework for clinical decision-making from proteome-wide biofluid data

Mueller-Reif, J. B.; Albrecht, V.; Brennsteiner, V.; Bader, J. M.; Treit, P. V.; Wewer Albrechtsen, N. J.; Pangratz-Fuehrer, S.; Mann, M.

2025-05-05 health informatics
10.1101/2025.05.02.25326901 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics provides deep molecular insights from patient samples, but clinical use has been limited by missing values, static biomarker panels, and the need for targeted assay development. We present a new framework - Adaptive Diagnostic Architecture for Personalized Testing by Mass Spectrometry (ADAPT-MS) - that enables direct diagnostic and prognostic interpretation of discovery-mode proteomics data at the level of individual samples. ADAPT-MS dynamically retrains simple, robust classifiers based on the proteins quantified in each sample, eliminating the need for imputation or fixed panels. Applied to plasma and cerebrospinal fluid datasets across diseases and clinical centers, it achieves high performance and generalizability using robust, transparent and generalizable statistical models. A single proteomic measurement can support multiple diagnostic questions via retrospective cohort matching, with each classification taking only seconds. As population-scale proteomics datasets grow, this approach lays the foundation for scalable, real-time, and personalized diagnostics directly from proteome-wide data. Such a community effort may help to transform discovery proteomics into a routine clinical tool. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=128 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25326901v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16269corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@410541org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c00e55org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ecfe38_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.