Child Developmental Patterns across Subtypes of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: TMM BirThree Cohort Study
Chen, G.; Ishikuro, M.; Ohseto, H.; Noda, A.; Shinoda, G.; Orui, M.; Obara, T.; Kuriyama, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundExposure to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and subtypes during the fetal stage has been linked to developmental delays in children. Longitudinal patterns in child development may reveal etiological and pathophysiological mechanisms; however, the associations between HDP subtypes and these patterns remain unclear. ObjectiveTo investigate the association between HDP subtypes and child developmental patterns. Study designThis study included 14,044 mother-child pairs from the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. The latent class trajectory model was applied to child development scores at 6, 12, 24, 42, and 48 months of age to generate patterns in five developmental domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, and personal/social. Multinomial Poisson regression analysis adjusted for covariates was used to calculate the risk ratios of different developmental patterns among exposure to HDP and the subtypes among all children and children born at term. ResultsThree patterns were identified in respective domains: "normal," "delay," "catch-up". Exposure to HDP was associated with a higher risk of delay pattern in gross motor (risk ratio [RR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.52) and of catch-up patterns in fine motor (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24) and problem solving (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28) domains. Exposure to gestational hypertension is associated with a higher risk of catch-up pattern in the fine motor domain (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36). Exposure to preeclampsia (PE) is associated with a higher risk of delay pattern in gross motor, fine motor, and problem solving domains (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.04; RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.65; RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.18-2.81). Children exposed to PE early onset has higher risks of catch-up pattern (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01-2.14; RR 1,64, 95% CI 1.05-2.41; RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.15-2.36; RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11-2.30), and 2-3 folds higher risks of delay pattern (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.08-3.15; RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.21-3.40; RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.15-5.31; RR 3.00, 95% CI 1.35-5.67) in quadruple domains. In the term-born population, except for PE, there was no association between HDP and adverse patterns. ConclusionsHDP and subtypes, particularly PE early onset, were associated with higher risks of delay child developmental pattern in multiple domains. PE was associated with a higher risk of catch-up pattern. Depending on the HDP subtype, the risks no longer linger in the term-born population.
Matching journals
The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 92%
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy and type 1 diabetes in the offspring: A nationwide register-based study with family-based designs 92%
- Association of heavy menstrual bleeding with cardiovascular diseases in US female hospitalizations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Isolated fetal neural tube defects associate with increased risk of placental pathology: evidence from the Collaborative Perinatal Project 94%
- Cardiovascular health in early pregnancy and circulating placental biomarkers 93%
- O-GlcNAc transferase contributes to sex-specific placental deregulation in gestational diabetes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of pre-existing maternal cardiovascular diseases with neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a cohort study in Sweden and British Columbia, Canada 94%
- Adverse childhood experiences and lower urinary tract symptoms in adolescence: the mediating effect of inflammation 91%
- Investigating a possible causal relationship between maternal serum urate concentrations and offspring birthweight: A Mendelian randomization study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.