Long-term negative divergence (1990-2019) between the United Kingdom and 21 peer countries in mortality at ages 25-49 years
Leon, D. A.; Danov, D.; Medina-Jaudes, N.; Danilova, I.; Shkolnikov, V. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe poor performance of the UK in reducing mortality compared to many other high-income countries following the 2008 financial crisis have been extensively studied, with particular attention to deaths of despair at working ages. However, longer-term trends in the differences in working-age mortality between the UK and peer countries have not been systematically investigated. MethodsWe compared trends (1990-2019) in age-standardised mortality rates at age 25-49 years in the UK and its constituent parts (England and its 9 standard regions, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) with those of 21 peer countries. FindingsBetween 1990 and 2019 the UK went from having relatively low mortality rates at age 25-49 years compared to its peers to having one of the highest. This reflects both the better progress made by many other countries in reducing mortality rates as well as an absolute increase in the UK from 2013. Against the counter-factual that rates in the UK followed the median of the comparator countries (2001-2019) this resulted in 3.1 million excess years of life lost. The divergence in mortality of the UK with its peers was apparent from 1990 and was observed for all constituent parts of the UK and English regions. External cause mortality accounted for much of the divergence in rates between 2001 and 2019 (69% women; 78% men), as did the overlapping categories of drug-related deaths (42%; 28%) and suicides (17%; 20%). Alcohol-related deaths made only a small contribution. InterpretationThe divergence in mortality rates at ages 25-49 years in the UK from peer countries was already apparent from 1990, pre-dating the austerity policies two decades later. Nevertheless, austerity may well have exacerbated this longer-term deterioration in the UKs position. The fact that all areas of the UK showed deterioration relative to peer countries indicates that this is a national problem.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 94%
- Risk of death among teachers in England and Wales during the Covid19 pandemic 93%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality among Care Home Residents in England during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of 4.3 million adults over the age of 65 92%
- Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK 91%
- Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- US Exceptionalism? International Trends in Midlife Mortality 96%
- Faltering survival improvements at young-middle ages in high-income English-speaking countries: population-level period and cohort analyses 94%
- Ethnic minority groups in England and Wales - factors affecting the size and timing of elevated COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective cohort study linking Census and death records 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.