Back

Computational modeling of necrosis in neural organoids

Pantula, A.; Zhou, B.; Morales Pantoja, I. E.; Fedotova, A.; George, D.; Alam El Din, D.-M.; Lysinger, A.; Smirnova, L.; Gracias, D. H.

2025-05-06 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.30.651571 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neural organoids (NOs), also known as brain organoids, are derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells and are Microphysiological Systems (MPS) of the brain that can recapitulate key aspects of neurodevelopment. They enable in vitro studies of brain development and disease mechanisms, providing disease models for various neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental/degenerative disorders like Alzheimers disease, microcephaly, and autism. There are many protocols to generate NOs with different complexities and sizes, varying from 400 m to several mm in diameter, with a starvation-induced necrotic core eventually forming depending on the diameter and culture conditions. Thus, they can benefit from vascularization and more optimal culture conditions. There have been several attempts to decrease necrosis while growing larger NOs, such as by using orbital shaking or 2D/3D microfluidic chips, but only with limited success. In this study, we describe a 3D finite element model to simulate O2 starvation-induced necrosis in NOs using the Damkohler Number (Da) and the Michaelis-Menten kinetics. We measured the necrotic areas in NOs using fluorescent imaging and used them to calibrate the model with a specific Da. Using these calibrated values, we systematically compared simulations of different NO culture methods--static, orbital shaking, and microfluidic flow around organoids--highlighting their relative impacts on nutrient diffusion and necrosis. We observed that these culture strategies cannot prevent necrosis beyond a diameter of [~]800 m. Based on these findings, we propose that 3D spatial perfusion, achieved through uniformly distributed fluidic capillaries within the NO, could significantly reduce necrosis. We conducted parametric studies on capillary spacing, density, and layout. Our calibrated model offers insights for designing next-generation microfabricated bioreactors and culture devices, not just for NOs but also for all 3D tissue engineering and organoid research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
9
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
15
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
24
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
26
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%