Back

Democratizing Organ-on-Chip Technologies with a Modular, Reusable, and Perfusion-Ready Microphysiological System

Minahan, D. J.; Nelson, K. M.; Ribeiro, F.; Ferrick, B. J.; Zurzolo, A. M.; Byers, K.; Gleghorn, J. P.

2025-05-07 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.30.651503 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Organ-on-chip (OOC) technologies, also called microphysi-ological systems (MPS), offer dynamic microenvironments that improve upon static culture systems, yet widespread adoption has been hindered by fabrication complexity, reliance on poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and limited modularity. Here, we present a modular MPS platform designed for ease of use, re-producibility, and broad applicability. The system comprises layered elastomeric inserts for dual monolayer cell culture, which is clamped within a reusable acrylic cassette for perfusion studies. This enables researchers to decouple model establishment from flow experiments and streamline their work-flows. We validated the system using dual epithelial and en-dothelial cell co-culture under static and perfused conditions, including shear-induced alignment of HUVECs. Material testing confirmed biocompatibility, while vinyl cutting reproducibility demonstrated high manufacturing fidelity. The platform reliably supported long-term culture (up to 14 days), and the open insert format facilitated uniform seeding and imaging access. This approach enables parallelized experimentation, minimizes pump usage, and is well-suited for labs without microfabrication infrastructure. By combining fabrication flexibility with biological robustness, this work establishes a generalizable platform for modular tissue-chip development adapted to diverse organ systems and serves as a foundational framework for democratizing advanced in vitro model systems. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=159 SRC="FIGDIR/small/651503v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e5fed3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bcf27eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d46f33org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d0912f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
3
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
7
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
11
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
15
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
23
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%